AIRLINK 74.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-0.34%)
BOP 5.14 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.78%)
CNERGY 4.55 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (2.94%)
DFML 37.15 Increased By ▲ 1.31 (3.66%)
DGKC 89.90 Increased By ▲ 1.90 (2.16%)
FCCL 22.40 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.9%)
FFBL 33.03 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (0.95%)
FFL 9.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.41%)
GGL 10.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.46%)
HBL 115.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.40 (-0.35%)
HUBC 137.10 Increased By ▲ 1.26 (0.93%)
HUMNL 9.95 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.12%)
KEL 4.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.22%)
KOSM 4.83 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (3.65%)
MLCF 39.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.33%)
OGDC 138.20 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (0.22%)
PAEL 27.00 Increased By ▲ 0.57 (2.16%)
PIAA 24.24 Decreased By ▼ -2.04 (-7.76%)
PIBTL 6.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.3%)
PPL 123.62 Increased By ▲ 0.72 (0.59%)
PRL 27.40 Increased By ▲ 0.71 (2.66%)
PTC 13.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.71%)
SEARL 61.75 Increased By ▲ 3.05 (5.2%)
SNGP 70.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-0.36%)
SSGC 10.52 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (1.54%)
TELE 8.57 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.12%)
TPLP 11.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-2.46%)
TRG 64.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.33%)
UNITY 26.76 Increased By ▲ 0.71 (2.73%)
WTL 1.38 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BR100 7,874 Increased By 36.2 (0.46%)
BR30 25,596 Increased By 136 (0.53%)
KSE100 75,342 Increased By 411.7 (0.55%)
KSE30 24,214 Increased By 68.6 (0.28%)

A civil court here has returned the suit filed by a local industry M/s Afridi Beverages (Pvt) Ltd relating to manufacturing and distribution of beverages by the name of Mecca Cola.
The court returned the plaint of M/s Afridi Beverages (Pvt) Ltd versus M/s Mirage Mehra (Pvt) Ltd the other day, ruling that the civil court had no jurisdiction to deal with matter pertaining to trademark.
In its detailed order the court of civil judge Ms Sunbal Naseer observed that under the Trade Mark Law the forum for adjudication of the matter pertaining to trademark would be court.
The court also recalled the stay order earlier issued in favour of Afridi Beverages against M/s Mirage Mehra through which the latter was restrained from manufacturing and distribution of Mecca Cola here.
The plaintiff had filed the instant suit in October 2003 against M/s Mirage Mehra (Pvt) Limited with the plea that they were using the trade name of Mecca Cola since long and it was their civil right to use the name.
The plaintiff added that the defendant M/s Mirage Mehra had no authority to manufacture or distribute Mecca Cola.
The defendant contended that they were sole authorised agent of Taoufik Mathlouthi who was the original owner and author of Mecca Cola having brand name registered under Trade Mark and Copy Right Act in France, therefore the plaintiff had no right to use the name of Mecca Cola.
An application was filed by the defendant for dismissal of the suit under order 7 Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code. Barrister Adnan Saboor Rohaila appeared for M/s Mirage Mehra and contended that the plaintiff had filed the instant suit on the basis of an alleged application submitted for the registration of trade mark and copy right and the suit of the plaintiff was liable to be dismissed.
He contended that the civil court had no jurisdiction to take cognisance of the matter and only district court could adjudicate upon the matter.
Secondly, he added, the alleged trade mark had not been registered under Trade Mark Act.
He added that the alleged trademark had been registered in France on August 14, 2002 and was protected under the international laws.
He added that Taoufik Mathlouthi is a Muslim citizen of France and Mecca Cola is being produced in UAE, Morocco, France, England and Canada.
Advocates Hamid Farooq Durrani and Manzoor Hussain Butt of Lahore appeared for the plaintiff Afridi Beverages and contended that in the present suit, the question of civil right was only involved that both the parties had applied for registration of trademark and till the registration, the plaintiff had civil right to sue the name of Mecca Cola.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2004

Comments

Comments are closed.