AIRLINK 72.18 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (0.68%)
BOP 4.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.4%)
CNERGY 4.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.91%)
DFML 28.49 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.21%)
DGKC 81.30 Decreased By ▼ -1.10 (-1.33%)
FCCL 21.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-2.05%)
FFBL 33.05 Decreased By ▼ -1.10 (-3.22%)
FFL 9.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-2.18%)
GGL 10.48 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (3.56%)
HBL 114.00 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (0.88%)
HUBC 140.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-0.36%)
HUMNL 9.03 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (12.45%)
KEL 4.73 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (7.99%)
KOSM 4.38 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-2.67%)
MLCF 37.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-0.95%)
OGDC 133.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.99 (-0.74%)
PAEL 25.60 Decreased By ▼ -1.02 (-3.83%)
PIAA 23.98 Decreased By ▼ -1.42 (-5.59%)
PIBTL 6.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.07%)
PPL 122.62 Increased By ▲ 0.67 (0.55%)
PRL 27.07 Decreased By ▼ -0.66 (-2.38%)
PTC 13.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-1.45%)
SEARL 56.62 Increased By ▲ 1.73 (3.15%)
SNGP 69.24 Decreased By ▼ -0.46 (-0.66%)
SSGC 10.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.58%)
TELE 8.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.59%)
TPLP 11.28 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (3.01%)
TRG 61.21 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (0.51%)
UNITY 25.33 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.44%)
WTL 1.50 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (17.19%)
BR100 7,619 Decreased By -19.5 (-0.25%)
BR30 24,973 Increased By 1.6 (0.01%)
KSE100 72,602 Decreased By -159.4 (-0.22%)
KSE30 23,539 Decreased By -86.6 (-0.37%)

The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) is legally empowered to proceed against companies in public interest for creating a level-playing field to enhance economic efficiency and to protect consumers from anti-competitive behaviour.

According to an order issued by the CCP Appellant Bench in the matter of complaint filed by M/s OLX Classifieds Pakistan (Complainant) against M/s Pak Wheels (Pvt) Ltd (respondent), the bench has clarified powers of the commission to proceed in public interest.

A three-member CCP bench said that upon conclusion of the enquiry under the Competition Act and in pursuance of the provisions of Section 37(4) of the Act, the commission may initiate proceedings under Section 30, where it is in the public interest, so to do (emphasis added).

Hence, from the language used in the Act, it is clear that the intent of the legislature behind the Act that is to create a level-playing field in order to enhance economic efficiencies and to protect consumers from the anti-competitive behaviour is that the commission has to proceed in public interest.

Thus, the commission is entrusted with the responsibility of looking after the interest of general public vis-à-vis anti-competitive conduct, and to create a level-playing field, in order to enhance economic efficiency in all spheres of commercial and economic activity and that too in public interest.

The proceedings before the commission are inquisitorial in nature and not adversarial; as the commission is carrying out its functions in public interest, the CCP Bench said.

The legislature, in all its wisdom, therefore, carefully crafted the framework under the Act, and we deem it appropriate to refer to the provisions of Section 33 of the Act in this regard, in particular, clauses (e) and (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 33 of the Act, the CCP bench said.

Bare perusal of the above provision leaves no doubt that the legislature, in all its wisdom, has used the word "proceeding" along with "enquiry" in Section 33 (1) mentioned above.

This means that the commission, even after initiation of proceedings under Section 30 of the Act retains the power to investigate or gather evidence, if it deems necessary in public interest.

This intent of the legislature to empower the commission with the inquisitorial/investigative authority during the proceedings under Section 30 of the Act is further evident from the provisions of Section 34(1) of the Act, the CCP added.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2020

Comments

Comments are closed.