BR100 Increased By (0.49%)
BR30 Increased By (0.41%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.32%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.21%)
BECO 6.04 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.17%)
BML 57.55 Increased By ▲ 4.80 (9.1%)
BOP 34.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.29%)
CNERGY 8.20 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.49%)
DCL 12.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.46%)
FCCL 54.10 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (0.39%)
FCSC 5.32 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.92%)
FFL 18.11 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.44%)
FNEL 1.31 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.77%)
HUMNL 11.24 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (2.18%)
KEL 8.16 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.62%)
KOSM 5.45 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.3%)
MLCF 88.85 Increased By ▲ 0.80 (0.91%)
NBP 186.50 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.01%)
PACE 10.69 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.28%)
PAEL 40.56 Increased By ▲ 0.62 (1.55%)
PIAHCLA 26.29 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.46%)
PIBTL 17.37 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.29%)
PPL 232.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.03%)
PRL 34.91 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.11%)
PTC 67.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.56 (-0.83%)
SEARL 91.83 Increased By ▲ 0.90 (0.99%)
SSGC 27.25 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.29%)
TELE 8.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.35%)
THCCL 64.85 Increased By ▲ 4.72 (7.85%)
TPLP 8.97 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (2.4%)
TREET 24.74 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.81%)
TRG 72.81 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (1.48%)
WAVES 10.70 Increased By ▲ 0.72 (7.21%)
WTL 1.28 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.59%)

ISLAMABAD: The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) has successfully enforced its order by recovering a cumulative penalty of PKR 40 million from two pharmaceutical firms for entering into an anti-competitive non-compete agreement in violation of Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2010.

The enforcement follows the upholding of CCP’s decision by the Competition Appellate Tribunal (CAT), which affirmed the Commission’s findings that the agreement constituted a prohibited market-sharing arrangement that restricted competition in the relevant market.

The case originated from a public disclosure made by United Distributors Pakistan Limited (UDPL) to the Pakistan Stock Exchange, revealing that it had entered into a non-compete agreement with and International Brands (Private) Limited (IBL). Under the agreement, UDPL agreed not to distribute human pharmaceutical products in Pakistan for a period of three years in exchange for a payment of PKR 1.131 billion from IBL.

The CCP determined that the arrangement effectively eliminated UDPL as a competitor in the relevant market. The substantial payment was identified as a financial incentive to secure UDPL’s exit, thereby reducing competitive pressure, distorting market dynamics, and creating barriers to entry.

Although the agreement contained a clause requiring regulatory approval, both undertakings failed to obtain prior exemption from the CCP and applied only after the issuance of show cause notices. The CCP rejected the exemption application on the grounds that the agreement did not meet the statutory criteria for exemption and that the violation had already taken place.

Accordingly, the CCP imposed a penalty of PKR 20 million each on UDPL and IBL under Section 38 of the Competition Act, 2010, for entering into and giving effect to the anti-competitive agreement. The Tribunal upheld the penalties, reinforcing the legality and soundness of the CCP’s enforcement action.

This enforcement underscores CCP’s continued commitment to ensuring compliance with competition law and taking firm action against agreements that distort competition and harm market dynamics.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2026

Comments

200 characters remaining
Zubair Edhy Mar 26, 2026 12:21am
They both are distribution companies, not pharma firms.
0 Reply