BR100 Increased By (1.02%)
BR30 Increased By (1.71%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.58%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.65%)
BECO 6.03 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (4.51%)
BML 52.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.39 (-0.74%)
BOP 34.23 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (0.71%)
CNERGY 8.16 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.62%)
DCL 12.23 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.25%)
FCCL 53.80 Increased By ▲ 0.97 (1.84%)
FCSC 5.24 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (3.35%)
FFL 18.03 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.45%)
FNEL 1.30 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.78%)
HUMNL 11.00 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.1%)
KEL 8.07 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.62%)
KOSM 5.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-2.36%)
MLCF 87.90 Increased By ▲ 1.39 (1.61%)
NBP 186.60 Increased By ▲ 1.44 (0.78%)
PACE 10.75 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (1.61%)
PAEL 39.95 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (1.34%)
PIAHCLA 26.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.11%)
PIBTL 17.32 Increased By ▲ 0.65 (3.9%)
PPL 233.49 Increased By ▲ 5.31 (2.33%)
PRL 34.98 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (0.87%)
PTC 67.71 Increased By ▲ 2.38 (3.64%)
SEARL 90.90 Increased By ▲ 0.77 (0.85%)
SSGC 27.20 Increased By ▲ 0.60 (2.26%)
TELE 8.57 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (3.5%)
THCCL 60.85 Increased By ▲ 2.35 (4.02%)
TPLP 8.78 Increased By ▲ 0.56 (6.81%)
TREET 24.65 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.49%)
TRG 71.50 Increased By ▲ 1.79 (2.57%)
WAVES 10.01 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.7%)
WTL 1.27 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.78%)

KARACHI: The Sindh High Court (SHC) has suspended orders that had revoked multiple customs agents’ licenses, ruling that the original suspension was implemented without proper justification or due process.

The court while hearing six connected petitions (C.P. No. D-466 of 2025 and C.P. Nos. 517, 518, 519, 536 & 537 of 2025) found that the Collectorate of Customs Appraisement had failed to provide reasons for the immediate suspension of the licenses through its circular dated February 1, 2025.

The court rejected the customs authorities’ defense that the suspension orders were processed through a computer system, stating that electronic processing “does not absolve the Respondents from following the law, rules and the precedents of the Courts.”

In its ruling, the court emphasised that while Rule 102 (4) of Customs Rules 2001 allows for immediate license suspension in emergency situations, such power should be exercised: Sparingly and only in extreme circumstances; With clear written reasoning; Following principles of natural justice; With prompt notification to affected parties; and followed by swift completion of subsequent proceedings

The court found the allegations against the agents, based primarily on WhatsApp messages exchanged with a Customs Appraiser through an outsider to be “vague” and insufficient to justify immediate suspension.

While allowing the petitions, the court directed the customs agents to respond to show-cause notices already issued and ordered the Licensing Authority to conduct hearings and pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law. The court preserved the petitioners’ right to seek further legal remedies if needed.

In response to the court order, Saifullah Khan Chairman All Pakistan Customs Agents Association (APCAA) said that the court order has validated APCAA’s stance that the suspension of licenses was not legally justified. “We have discussed it with customs authorities during every meeting held on this issue but they didn’t bother now the court order has proved us right.”

Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.