BR100 Decreased By (-0.27%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.6%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.53%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.81%)
BECO 5.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-3.48%)
BML 57.82 Increased By ▲ 5.07 (9.61%)
BOP 33.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-1.31%)
CNERGY 8.16 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
DCL 11.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.54 (-4.38%)
FCCL 53.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-0.63%)
FCSC 5.45 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (4.41%)
FFL 17.87 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.89%)
FNEL 1.31 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.77%)
HUMNL 11.16 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (1.45%)
KEL 8.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.99%)
KOSM 5.46 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.49%)
MLCF 87.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-0.28%)
NBP 184.30 Decreased By ▼ -2.18 (-1.17%)
PACE 11.60 Increased By ▲ 0.88 (8.21%)
PAEL 40.20 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (0.65%)
PIAHCLA 26.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.08%)
PIBTL 17.17 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.87%)
PPL 229.00 Decreased By ▼ -3.78 (-1.62%)
PRL 34.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.55 (-1.57%)
PTC 67.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.24%)
SEARL 90.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.13%)
SSGC 26.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.35 (-1.29%)
TELE 8.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.35%)
THCCL 66.14 Increased By ▲ 6.01 (10%)
TPLP 9.30 Increased By ▲ 0.54 (6.16%)
TREET 24.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.37%)
TRG 71.90 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.21%)
WAVES 10.98 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (10.02%)
WTL 1.28 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.59%)

This is apropos letters to the Editor by this writer carried by the newspaper in recent days. In this writer’s view, however, even if the US were to start constructing a parallel system today, it would take at least 12 years to reach the level of maturity that the BRI has achieved as of 2025.

By that time, the BRI itself would have advanced another decade, further consolidating China’s economic influence. Given this reality, a more pragmatic approach for the US would be to rethink its strategy—not by opposing the BRI, but by engaging with it.

Instead of treating China as a rival in global infrastructure development, the US should consider a cooperative approach, joining BRI projects as an equal partner. China has consistently extended invitations to all nations, including its geopolitical adversaries such as the US and India, to collaborate within the BRI framework.

By leveraging the unmatched expertise of US entrepreneurs, managers, and innovators, the BRI could be significantly enhanced in terms of efficiency, transparency, and governance.

A strategic partnership between the world’s two largest economies would not only benefit the partner nations involved but also set a new precedent for global cooperation.

Rather than engaging in a zero-sum competition, a US-China collaboration on infrastructure and development initiatives could usher in an era of shared prosperity, sustainable growth, and geopolitical stability.

Ultimately, global economic development should not be viewed as a contest of dominance but as an opportunity for mutual benefit. By fostering a cooperative rather than adversarial relationship, the U.S. and China could lead the world toward an unprecedented level of economic integration and progress.–Concluded

Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Qamar Bashir

The writer is a former Press Secretary to the President, An ex-Press Minister at Embassy of Pakistan to France, a former MD, SRBC Macomb, Detroit, Michigan

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.