BR100 Decreased By (-0.23%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.01%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.19%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.24%)
AGHA 7.74 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.65%)
BECO 5.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.38%)
BML 60.01 Decreased By ▼ -1.22 (-1.99%)
BOP 36.46 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (1.28%)
CNERGY 11.94 Increased By ▲ 0.69 (6.13%)
CSIL 6.17 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FCCL 57.36 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (0.84%)
FFL 16.58 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.42%)
FNEL 1.20 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KEL 7.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.35%)
KOSM 6.05 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
LOTCHEM 27.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.22%)
MLCF 102.07 Decreased By ▼ -1.02 (-0.99%)
NBP 206.35 Decreased By ▼ -1.28 (-0.62%)
NCPL 62.62 Increased By ▲ 0.70 (1.13%)
NPL 71.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.28%)
OGDC 319.19 Increased By ▲ 0.70 (0.22%)
PACE 11.38 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (2.89%)
PAEL 43.88 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-1.13%)
PIBTL 16.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.36%)
PPL 221.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.93 (-0.42%)
PRL 63.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.09%)
PTC 72.41 Decreased By ▼ -0.75 (-1.03%)
SSGC 27.28 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.11%)
TBL 9.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.2%)
TELE 8.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-2.16%)
TPL 20.68 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (1.67%)
TPLP 14.98 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.07%)
TREET 24.10 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TRG 63.29 Increased By ▲ 0.92 (1.48%)

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Tax Ombudsman (FTO) has recommended the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) to recover multi-million unchallenged tax demand from a Chinese company through Embassy of China and Ministry of Foreign Affairs Pakistan.

It is reliably learnt that landmark order has been issued by FTO Dr Asif Jah in a public interest complaint moved by a tax lawyer Waheed Shahbaz Butt, against the FBR officers for their delay in recovery of unchallenged tax demand runs into Rs632 million against a Chinese company.

FTO order stated, “Complaint was filed against alleged non-recovery of undisputed tax demand created in the case of a Chinese company.

The complainant has highlighted the non-recovery of unchallenged tax demands from Respondents, which allegedly appears to be intentionally ignored by the FBR/CTO/RTO. Inaction is solely aimed at providing unholy benefits to some senior officers within the organization/FBR. The Complainant has emphasised the gravity of the situation and the implications it has for the integrity and credibility of the FBR. The Complainant further states that the deliberate negligence in recovering unchallenged tax demand not only undermines the principles of fairness and justice but also raises questions about the ethical conduct of certain senior officers entrusted with crucial responsibilities within the FBR. Furthermore, it has been observed that the FBR has failed to initiate any action or take measures to recover unchallenged tax demand on the basis of orders passed u/s 122(5A) read with (2022 PTD 1839) for the Tax Years 2007, 2008, 2009, 2011 and 2012.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.