BR100 Decreased By (-0.81%)
BR30 Decreased By (-1.11%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.81%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.81%)
AGHA 7.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.3%)
BECO 5.51 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (5.15%)
BML 59.08 Decreased By ▼ -1.14 (-1.89%)
BOP 34.11 Decreased By ▼ -1.17 (-3.32%)
CNERGY 12.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-2.21%)
CSIL 6.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.16%)
FCCL 57.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-0.53%)
FFL 16.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-1.34%)
FNEL 1.21 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.83%)
KEL 7.48 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KOSM 5.94 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.66%)
LOTCHEM 27.99 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (0.86%)
MLCF 100.65 Decreased By ▼ -2.33 (-2.26%)
NBP 203.75 Decreased By ▼ -2.29 (-1.11%)
NCPL 60.57 Decreased By ▼ -1.67 (-2.68%)
NPL 69.96 Decreased By ▼ -1.33 (-1.87%)
OGDC 320.29 Decreased By ▼ -3.49 (-1.08%)
PACE 11.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.41 (-3.56%)
PAEL 43.12 Decreased By ▼ -0.78 (-1.78%)
PIBTL 16.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.72%)
PPL 228.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.63 (-0.27%)
PRL 71.02 Increased By ▲ 0.91 (1.3%)
PTC 71.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-0.69%)
SSGC 26.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.43 (-1.59%)
TBL 9.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.51%)
TELE 8.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.26%)
TPL 22.24 Decreased By ▼ -0.38 (-1.68%)
TPLP 15.11 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-3.64%)
TREET 24.13 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.33%)
TRG 59.84 Decreased By ▼ -1.29 (-2.11%)

The oil and gas regulatory authority (Ogra) and Sui Northern Gas Pipeline (SNGPL) here Friday asked Lahore High Court to dismiss a petition challenging increase in POL prices and slab rates of Sui gas after declaring it non-maintainable. Both the authorities through their counsel filed a reply to the petition filed by General Secretary Consumer Rights Forum, Muhammad Hanif Goraya, challenging increase in the POL prices and gas tariff.
The counsel of the respondent said that the petitioner had an alternative remedy under section 12(2) of Ogra ordinance 2002 to agitate POL prices. About the Slab Rates of Sui gas, the petitioner had a remedy of filing review under rule 16 of natural gas tariff rules 2002, the counsel for SNGPL argued before the court.
At this, the petitioner's counsel sought time to prepare his arguments in this regard and the court deferred hearing. The petitioner had contended that instead of cutting back on its own expenditure and luxuries, the rulers are keeping the masses in pain by repeating increase in the POL and gas prices every month. He said high petroleum prices mean high rates of every item consumed by the poor to sustain their life.
He said it is pity that government has tended to up the prices when POL rates are on the decline in the international market. He prayed to the court to direct the respondents to recall the decision and reverse prices. He also requested the court to set aside a notification of increasing Slab Rates of gas.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2011

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.