BR100 Increased By (1.77%)
BR30 Increased By (1.96%)
KSE100 Increased By (1.59%)
KSE30 Increased By (1.65%)
BECO 5.62 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.72%)
BML 59.50 Decreased By ▼ -1.72 (-2.81%)
BOP 34.55 Increased By ▲ 0.87 (2.58%)
CNERGY 8.10 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.25%)
DCL 12.06 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (3.61%)
FCCL 54.40 Increased By ▲ 2.26 (4.33%)
FCSC 5.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-2.31%)
FFL 18.03 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.11%)
FNEL 1.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.48%)
HUMNL 11.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.18%)
KEL 8.05 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (2.68%)
KOSM 5.93 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (3.49%)
MLCF 90.70 Increased By ▲ 4.19 (4.84%)
NBP 191.00 Increased By ▲ 6.70 (3.64%)
PACE 11.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-1.29%)
PAEL 41.26 Increased By ▲ 1.30 (3.25%)
PIAHCLA 25.75 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.31%)
PIBTL 17.52 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (1.45%)
PPL 226.70 Increased By ▲ 4.03 (1.81%)
PRL 34.70 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (0.7%)
PTC 64.60 Increased By ▲ 0.86 (1.35%)
SEARL 91.50 Increased By ▲ 1.04 (1.15%)
SSGC 26.98 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (1.16%)
TELE 8.93 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.22%)
THCCL 69.10 Increased By ▲ 0.63 (0.92%)
TPLP 10.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.35 (-3.13%)
TREET 24.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.24%)
TRG 69.40 Decreased By ▼ -1.19 (-1.69%)
WAVES 11.24 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.17%)
WTL 1.29 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.57%)
Business & Finance

Cumulus Media sues JPMorgan over refinancing plan

NEW YORK: Cumulus Media Inc has sued JPMorgan Chase & Co seeking a court order declaring that the second-largest US radio network is allowed to proceed with a refinancing that it says would deleverage the company by up to $305 million.
Published December 13, 2016 Updated December 13, 2016 07:36pm

imageNEW YORK: Cumulus Media Inc has sued JPMorgan Chase & Co seeking a court order declaring that the second-largest US radio network is allowed to proceed with a refinancing that it says would deleverage the company by up to $305 million.

In a lawsuit filed late on Monday in Manhattan federal court, Cumulus accused JPMorgan of breaching a 2013 credit agreement and "unreasonably" withholding consent to certain components of the Atlanta-based company's planned refinancing.

Cumulus said that JPMorgan's actions in its role as administrative agent under the credit agreement are threatening a deal it recently reached with bondholders, which was contingent upon the refinancing being completed by Jan. 27.

"Cumulus needs to proceed with its proposed refinancing, and it needs to do so quickly," Cumulus said in the complaint.

A spokesman for JPMorgan did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

According to the lawsuit, in response to an industry-wide decline in business, Cumulus, which owns 447 radio stations, has launched a series of initiatives aimed at improving ratings and revenues.

But Cumulus said its ability to follow through on these initiatives is hindered by a "heavy debt load" of $2.4 billion, including $610 million of senior notes due in 2019.

As a result, Cumulus reached a deal with a majority of bondholders in which they would refinance those senior notes using borrowings from Cumulus's $200 million revolving line of credit, the lawsuit said. The deal allows Cumulus to retire the notes at a discount of up to 50 cents on the dollar and avoid a "springing maturity" on a $1.84 billion loan that occurs if more than $200 million of the notes are outstanding in January 2019, the lawsuit said.

But Cumulus said JPMorgan has refused to take various steps required under the plan, including allowing the transfer of the revolving credit line to new lenders and executing a loan amendment allowing the company to access the credit line.

The lawsuit seeks a court order declaring among other things that Cumulus's credit agreement permits it to use the revolving credit line as part of its refinancing plan and may amend a restriction that would enable it to access the credit line.

It also seeks an order requiring JPMorgan to consent to the assignment of the credit line to the new lenders and undertake other actions necessary to effectuate the refinancing.

The case is Cumulus Media Holdings Inc. et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., US District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 16-09591.

Copyright Reuters, 2016

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.