AIRLINK 72.80 Increased By ▲ 0.62 (0.86%)
BOP 5.06 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (2.64%)
CNERGY 4.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.46%)
DFML 30.52 Increased By ▲ 2.03 (7.13%)
DGKC 85.95 Increased By ▲ 4.65 (5.72%)
FCCL 22.35 Increased By ▲ 0.85 (3.95%)
FFBL 33.22 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.51%)
FFL 9.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.81%)
GGL 10.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.76%)
HBL 113.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.38 (-0.33%)
HUBC 136.20 Decreased By ▼ -3.80 (-2.71%)
HUMNL 10.03 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (11.07%)
KEL 4.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.48%)
KOSM 4.40 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.46%)
MLCF 38.35 Increased By ▲ 0.70 (1.86%)
OGDC 133.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-0.22%)
PAEL 27.40 Increased By ▲ 1.80 (7.03%)
PIAA 24.76 Increased By ▲ 0.78 (3.25%)
PIBTL 6.55 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.08%)
PPL 121.21 Decreased By ▼ -1.41 (-1.15%)
PRL 27.15 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.3%)
PTC 13.89 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (2.13%)
SEARL 60.40 Increased By ▲ 3.78 (6.68%)
SNGP 68.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.71 (-1.03%)
SSGC 10.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.1%)
TELE 9.05 Increased By ▲ 0.60 (7.1%)
TPLP 11.26 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.18%)
TRG 65.70 Increased By ▲ 4.49 (7.34%)
UNITY 25.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.32%)
WTL 1.50 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BR100 7,608 Decreased By -22.2 (-0.29%)
BR30 25,091 Increased By 100.6 (0.4%)
KSE100 72,658 Increased By 56.2 (0.08%)
KSE30 23,383 Decreased By -155.9 (-0.66%)

The Supreme Court on Friday accepted the appeal of a former chief executive officer (CEO) of Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) against the order of SC Registrar Office, said sources.

Justice Qazi Faez Isa on Friday heard Irfan Qadir, a senior advocate who represented ex-CEO PIA Musharraf Rasool Cyan, in his chamber and turned down the Registrar's order and directed the SC office to fix the case before a bench in the court.

The Supreme Court on July 31, 2018 had set aside the appointment of Cyan as CEO of the national flag carrier on grounds that his elevation to the post was against rules and procedure, saying laws were not followed in the appointment of Cyan as PIA CEO.

The Registrar had raised objection, "The subject HRC application has been examined, scrutinized and found to be not entertainable under Order X Rule 2 of Supreme Court Rules 1980".

The petitioner contended that justice should not be denied to a person on such flimsy grounds. To obstruct the Appellant from filing the above application is tantamount to denying him the very right to seek justice and to properly defend himself and that too against an order which was bereft of jurisdiction.

The office while returning the application has not examined the case objectively but rather subjectively which amounts to travesty of justice. The matter brought before the court is of public interest which requires adjudication by this court, said the petitioner.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2019

Comments

Comments are closed.