BR100 Decreased By (-1.2%)
BR30 Decreased By (-1.31%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.95%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.95%)
AGHA 6.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.78%)
BECO 4.27 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-2.29%)
BML 62.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-0.3%)
BOP 31.23 Decreased By ▼ -0.39 (-1.23%)
CNERGY 11.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.53%)
CSIL 5.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.37 (-6.08%)
FCCL 61.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.55 (-0.89%)
FFL 15.02 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (1.97%)
FNEL 1.23 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (2.5%)
KEL 6.26 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.62%)
KOSM 5.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-2.11%)
LOTCHEM 24.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.37 (-1.48%)
MLCF 104.08 Decreased By ▼ -1.19 (-1.13%)
NBP 175.28 Decreased By ▼ -5.29 (-2.93%)
NCPL 52.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.56 (-1.05%)
NPL 54.12 Decreased By ▼ -0.67 (-1.22%)
OGDC 313.39 Decreased By ▼ -2.70 (-0.85%)
PACE 9.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-2.02%)
PAEL 35.80 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (1.02%)
PIBTL 13.47 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-2.32%)
PPL 221.81 Decreased By ▼ -3.54 (-1.57%)
PRL 79.08 Decreased By ▼ -1.31 (-1.63%)
PTC 46.85 Decreased By ▼ -1.17 (-2.44%)
SSGC 23.87 Decreased By ▼ -0.54 (-2.21%)
TBL 9.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.75%)
TELE 7.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-2.64%)
TPL 25.11 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-0.91%)
TPLP 12.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.59 (-4.5%)
TREET 26.25 Increased By ▲ 1.21 (4.83%)
TRG 53.44 Decreased By ▼ -1.39 (-2.54%)

This is apropos a letter to the Editor titled ‘Security, without the usual guarantor’ carried by the newspaper yesterday.

In my view, the emerging partnership between Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Turkey is therefore a logical development.

Each brings different capabilities and strategic advantages. Pakistan possesses substantial military experience and capabilities, Turkiye has developed a significant defence industry and Saudi Arabia brings considerable financial resources and a central position in Gulf security. Combining these strengths could improve deterrence, intelligence cooperation, military preparedness and access to defence technology.

The agreement’s provisions for logistical support, operational cooperation and defence production suggest that the partnership could eventually extend well beyond conventional mutual defence commitments.

There will inevitably be limitations. The three countries have distinct security priorities, diplomatic relationships and domestic political constraints.

Turkiye’s NATO membership introduces additional considerations, while its constitution requires separate parliamentary authorisation for overseas troop deployments.

The agreement itself provides for members to assess the assistance required and determine the scope of their contribution. Such qualifications are important because mutual defence arrangements ultimately depend on political decisions taken under circumstances that cannot be fully anticipated when agreements are signed.

Sanam Mehdi Hasan, Lahore

Copyright Business Recorder, 2026

Comments

200 characters remaining