BR100 Decreased By (-0.16%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.26%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.21%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.28%)
AGHA 6.56 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.61%)
BECO 4.27 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-1.16%)
BML 57.51 Increased By ▲ 0.47 (0.82%)
BOP 29.08 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-0.58%)
CNERGY 12.52 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.05%)
CSIL 5.11 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.58%)
FCCL 52.12 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.1%)
FFL 14.03 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.14%)
FNEL 1.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.72%)
KEL 6.05 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.51%)
KOSM 5.38 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
LOTCHEM 26.38 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-0.83%)
MLCF 90.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-0.35%)
NBP 158.42 Decreased By ▼ -2.32 (-1.44%)
NCPL 50.97 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-0.51%)
NPL 54.98 Decreased By ▼ -1.01 (-1.8%)
OGDC 306.12 Decreased By ▼ -2.54 (-0.82%)
PACE 9.78 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (2.19%)
PAEL 33.96 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (0.68%)
PIBTL 13.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.44%)
PPL 218.94 Increased By ▲ 0.59 (0.27%)
PRL 93.07 Increased By ▲ 1.95 (2.14%)
PTC 58.84 Decreased By ▼ -1.25 (-2.08%)
SSGC 23.06 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.09%)
TBL 9.33 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (4.13%)
TELE 7.17 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TPL 20.17 Increased By ▲ 0.76 (3.92%)
TPLP 12.38 Increased By ▲ 0.58 (4.92%)
TREET 23.72 Increased By ▲ 1.47 (6.61%)
TRG 55.29 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.13%)
Business & Finance

HDFC Bank slips to 2-1/2-year low as legal, leadership woes linger

  • India's HDFC Bank faces a U.S. class-action lawsuit, leadership uncertainty, and mis-selling allegations, driving its shares to a 2.5-year low
Published Updated
By

Shares of HDFC Bank, India’s top private lender, fell for a third straight session on Thursday, dragging the country’s benchmark stock index amid concerns over legal, regulatory and leadership challenges.

The lender’s shares slipped as much as 2.37% to their lowest in two and a half years, losing $2.6 billion in market value at close of trade.

The shares, down more than a quarter this year, are on course for their worst drop since 2008.

HDFC Bank is the largest stock by weightage on India’s benchmark Nifty 50 index, which has fallen 7.8% this year.

The lender is facing a possible U.S. class-action lawsuit over alleged illegal payments worth 450 million rupees ($4.7 million) to Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation to induce large deposits.

On August 13, a couple of law firms filed a proposed federal securities class action in a U.S. District Court against HDFC Bank and two of its executives over the alleged illegal payments. Several other law firms have also issued alerts to HDFC Bank investors regarding the proposed class action.

HDFC leads Indian banks lower as weak margin disappoints

“The U.S. class-action lawsuit has emerged as a near-term overhang, denting sentiment and tempering investor optimism despite the stock’s attractive valuations,” said Aishvarya Dadheech, founder and chief investment officer at Fident Asset Management.

“The Street is likely to remain cautious until further details emerge.”

An HDFC Bank spokesperson told Reuters that the bank “believes the lawsuit is without merit and intends to vigorously defend itself.”

“In the United States, these types of shareholder lawsuits are incredibly common after a company experiences a stock drop, and many companies listed in the U.S. routinely defend these lawsuits each year,” the spokesperson said.

Earlier this week, Mint newspaper reported, citing investors, that more than 75 clients who bought Carlisle’s Luxembourg Life Fund through HDFC Bank’s Dubai operations were planning to approach the Indian Prime Minister’s Office, the central bank and overseas regulators over alleged mis-selling, losses and delayed redemptions.

HDFC Bank told Reuters it does not provide any advice in relation to third party products and that it was ultimately for the customers to make their own informed decisions.

The lender’s shares had slid in March after its part-time chair abruptly resigned citing ethical differences with management.

Uncertainty over chief executive Sashidhar Jagdishan’s tenure also remains an overhang for the stock, traders said. Jagdishan’s term ends on October 26.

A temporary extension would prolong succession concerns and could pressure the stock further, while a three-year renewal would remove a key uncertainty, Macquarie said.

The bank did not respond to a query on the CEO reappointment.

Comments

200 characters remaining