BR100 Increased By (0.01%)
BR30 Increased By (0.53%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.28%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.29%)
AGHA 6.38 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.95%)
BECO 4.35 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.87%)
BML 62.55 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.16%)
BOP 31.39 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.51%)
CNERGY 11.73 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.21%)
CSIL 5.91 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (3.32%)
FCCL 61.71 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.28%)
FFL 14.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-1.53%)
FNEL 1.24 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.81%)
KEL 6.32 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.96%)
KOSM 5.90 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (6.12%)
LOTCHEM 24.69 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.04%)
MLCF 103.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.14%)
NBP 173.32 Decreased By ▼ -1.96 (-1.12%)
NCPL 51.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.94 (-1.78%)
NPL 54.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.17%)
OGDC 315.87 Increased By ▲ 2.48 (0.79%)
PACE 9.26 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.65%)
PAEL 35.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-0.61%)
PIBTL 13.66 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.41%)
PPL 226.07 Increased By ▲ 4.26 (1.92%)
PRL 80.28 Increased By ▲ 1.20 (1.52%)
PTC 46.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.45%)
SSGC 23.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.21%)
TBL 9.24 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.75%)
TELE 7.55 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (2.17%)
TPL 24.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-2.27%)
TPLP 12.99 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (3.84%)
TREET 25.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-1.03%)
TRG 53.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.21%)
Business & Finance

Aurangzeb calls for review of NFC Award's population criterion

  • Finance Minister calls for reviewing the "unsustainable" 82% population-based NFC Award resource distribution.
Published Updated

Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb said on Wednesday the government would have to review the National Finance Commission (NFC) Award’s population-based resource distribution formula, arguing that the current 82% weight assigned to population is ‘not sustainable’.

“So whenever we move this NFC discussion forward in terms of horizontal matrices, this formula will have to be looked at and reviewed,” he said, while addressing an event.

The National Finance Commission (NFC) Award is a constitutional body in Pakistan responsible for distributing tax revenue between the federal and provincial governments, and then among the provinces themselves. Under the Constitution, an NFC is mandated to be formed every five years to devise an appropriate mechanism for financial allocation.

The 7th NFC Award was the first to adopt a multi-factor formula, reducing the population’s weight from 100% to 82% and incorporating factors like poverty levels (10.3%), revenue generation (5%), and inverse population density (2.7%).

Since the 7th NFC Award, there has been considerable debate and calls for a new award to address evolving fiscal needs and imbalance.

Meanwhile, while addressing the event, Aurangzeb termed population growth and climate change ‘existential issues’ for Pakistan.

“If we don’t address these two existential issues, then in terms of the potential of Pakistan by the time we get to be 100 years old, we are not going to get there,” he said.

Aurangzeb said while the government had taken immediate steps through the federal budget—such as removing the sales tax on contraceptives—those measures alone would not be enough to address the country’s demographic challenges.

“As I mentioned, these are tactical measures,” he said, adding that deeper structural reforms would be required to produce lasting results.

The minister stressed that measurable targets and regular monitoring should back the implementation of the National Population Council’s agenda.

On financing population-related initiatives, the finance minister said resources would be available beyond the annual federal budget through the World Bank’s 10-year Country Partnership Framework.

“Roughly $600 million to $700 million per year is available to finance all interventions that are going to be there around population,” he said.

Comments

200 characters remaining
Rebirth Jul 15, 2026 01:54pm
Revenue generation should be 15%. Poverty rate and population scarcity should be 1.5% each. The first is a productive segment of the economy leading to growth, the latter will just help people get by.
0 Reply