BR100 Increased By (3.09%)
BR30 Increased By (2.45%)
KSE100 Increased By (2.48%)
KSE30 Increased By (2.67%)
AGHA 6.20 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.31%)
BECO 4.25 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (2.16%)
BML 62.99 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (0.41%)
BOP 31.80 Increased By ▲ 0.90 (2.91%)
CNERGY 12.15 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (1.5%)
CSIL 5.60 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (3.32%)
FCCL 59.40 Increased By ▲ 2.62 (4.61%)
FFL 13.50 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (1.2%)
FNEL 1.19 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (3.48%)
KEL 6.12 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (2%)
KOSM 5.60 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (2.19%)
LOTCHEM 24.80 Increased By ▲ 0.43 (1.76%)
MLCF 102.61 Increased By ▲ 5.12 (5.25%)
NBP 181.25 Increased By ▲ 6.75 (3.87%)
NCPL 49.60 Increased By ▲ 1.13 (2.33%)
NPL 51.98 Increased By ▲ 1.75 (3.48%)
OGDC 315.38 Increased By ▲ 4.91 (1.58%)
PACE 9.25 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (2.21%)
PAEL 34.05 Increased By ▲ 0.98 (2.96%)
PIBTL 13.47 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (2.43%)
PPL 220.00 Increased By ▲ 2.83 (1.3%)
PRL 86.29 Increased By ▲ 0.63 (0.74%)
PTC 49.35 Increased By ▲ 3.16 (6.84%)
SSGC 23.64 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (1.37%)
TBL 9.15 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.44%)
TELE 6.85 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.78%)
TPL 26.44 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (1.3%)
TPLP 12.81 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.1%)
TREET 24.08 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (1.18%)
TRG 53.88 Increased By ▲ 0.71 (1.34%)

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Tax Ombudsman (FTO) has strongly criticized the tax Department for issuing harsh assessment orders on the basis of unverified third-party information, observing that assessing officers are duty-bound to ascertain facts before penalizing taxpayers.

In a case, the taxpayer was assessed on the allegation of purchasing a motor vehicle, despite her categorical written denial that she had ever booked, purchased, or made any payment for such vehicle. She maintained that her CNIC had been misused.

The Ombudsman noted with serious concern that the assessing officer proceeded with the amended assessment without conducting even the most elementary verification. Not a single letter was issued to the vehicle manufacturer, nor was any effort made to confirm the source of investment or payment before concluding the proceedings.

On this FTO office itself undertook the necessary investigation. The information obtained directly from the vehicle manufacturer and the concerned bank revealed that the payments were made from an account maintained by another individual, conclusively establishing fraudulent misuse of the taxpayer’s CNIC.

Further inquiry by the FTO office from the Excise and Taxation authorities confirmed that the vehicle was never genuinely owned by the taxpayer and had been transferred through other individuals, including a person found to be outside the income tax system.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2026

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.