BR100 Decreased By (-0.15%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.74%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.41%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.67%)
BECO 5.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-3.81%)
BML 58.03 Increased By ▲ 5.28 (10.01%)
BOP 33.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.40 (-1.17%)
CNERGY 8.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.12%)
DCL 11.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-4.62%)
FCCL 53.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.54 (-1%)
FCSC 5.40 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (3.45%)
FFL 17.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.78%)
FNEL 1.31 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.77%)
HUMNL 11.06 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.55%)
KEL 8.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.74%)
KOSM 5.45 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.3%)
MLCF 87.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.86 (-0.98%)
NBP 184.60 Decreased By ▼ -1.88 (-1.01%)
PACE 11.62 Increased By ▲ 0.90 (8.4%)
PAEL 40.31 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (0.93%)
PIAHCLA 26.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.27%)
PIBTL 17.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-1.33%)
PPL 228.40 Decreased By ▼ -4.38 (-1.88%)
PRL 34.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-1.03%)
PTC 67.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.31%)
SEARL 91.00 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.08%)
SSGC 26.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-0.99%)
TELE 8.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.47%)
THCCL 66.14 Increased By ▲ 6.01 (10%)
TPLP 9.29 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (6.05%)
TREET 24.59 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.2%)
TRG 71.69 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.08%)
WAVES 10.98 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (10.02%)
WTL 1.28 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.59%)

ISLAMABAD: The Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue (ATIR), Multan Bench, in a landmark judgment, has held that taxpayers are under a statutory obligation to deposit 90 percent of tax chargeable under the advance income tax provisions of Section 147 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, into the national exchequer. Any failure, the Tribunal ruled, attracts liability to pay default surcharge to the Government of Pakistan.

It is reliably learnt that ATIR ordered that the appellant had admittedly failed to discharge ninety percent of its advance tax liability, thus squarely attracting the provisions of section 205(1B).

It clarified that the reliance placed by the taxpayer on section 205(1) (a) was “wholly misconceived,” since that clause merely excludes advance tax from subsection (1), leaving its treatment to special provisions, subsections (1A) and (1B).

Wealth tax: technical error in prescribed form

Dismissing the appeals filed by the taxpayer, the ATIR categorically held that the contentions raised were without merit, misconceived in law, and contrary to binding judicial pronouncements.

Legal experts have termed the decision a significant precedent reinforcing the mandatory nature of advance tax obligations under Section 147 and the strict application of default surcharge provisions under Section 205(1B).

Commenting on the recent developments, tax lawyer Waheed Shahzad Butt told Business Recorder that it is “extreme negligence on the part of FBR team that they are unaware of the unambiguous provision of Section 205(1B) of the Ordinance. The FBR had itself remained involved in state-sponsored moves to recover taxes directly from the bank accounts of taxpayers”.

The show cause notice has rightly been issued under section 205(1B), and the computation of default surcharge stands unchallenged,”.

Upholding the orders of the Assessing Officer, the ATIR confirmed the imposition of default surcharge amounting to Rs. 23,995,342 and Rs. 57,034,823, in toto, ATIR ordered.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.