BR100 Decreased By (-0.15%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.74%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.41%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.67%)
BECO 5.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-3.81%)
BML 58.03 Increased By ▲ 5.28 (10.01%)
BOP 33.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.40 (-1.17%)
CNERGY 8.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.12%)
DCL 11.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-4.62%)
FCCL 53.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.54 (-1%)
FCSC 5.40 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (3.45%)
FFL 17.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.78%)
FNEL 1.31 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.77%)
HUMNL 11.06 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.55%)
KEL 8.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.74%)
KOSM 5.45 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.3%)
MLCF 87.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.86 (-0.98%)
NBP 184.60 Decreased By ▼ -1.88 (-1.01%)
PACE 11.62 Increased By ▲ 0.90 (8.4%)
PAEL 40.31 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (0.93%)
PIAHCLA 26.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.27%)
PIBTL 17.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-1.33%)
PPL 228.40 Decreased By ▼ -4.38 (-1.88%)
PRL 34.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-1.03%)
PTC 67.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.31%)
SEARL 91.00 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.08%)
SSGC 26.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-0.99%)
TELE 8.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.47%)
THCCL 66.14 Increased By ▲ 6.01 (10%)
TPLP 9.29 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (6.05%)
TREET 24.59 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.2%)
TRG 71.69 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.08%)
WAVES 10.98 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (10.02%)
WTL 1.28 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.59%)

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has recently adjudicated three income tax reference applications filed by a company registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP) under section 42 of the Companies Act, 2017.

The company, which operates schools affiliated with a private housing society, contended that, despite the absence of the Commissioner’s approval under section 2(36) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (Ordinance), it is nonetheless entitled to claim a tax credit under section 100C of the Ordinance for the tax years 2015, 2016, and 2017.

The company’s argument was based on the assertion that its case fell under section 100C(2)(a) of the Ordinance, thereby obviating the need to meet any further conditions for availing the full 100% tax credit. Additionally, the company argued that its registration with the SECP as a non-profit entity should be deemed sufficient to entitle it to the tax credit under section 100C.

Initially, the IHC admitted the company’s tax references and granted an interim injunction against the recovery of taxes. However, when the case was argued at length, the IHC concurred with the submissions made by the Commissioner’s legal counsel, Osama Shahid (Advocate), and ruled that, notwithstanding the company’s registration status with the SECP, in order to avail tax credit under section 100C of the Ordinance, the company was required to obtain the Commissioner’s approval under section 2(36) of the Ordinance.

The failure to fulfill this essential condition resulted in the company being held liable for tax, declared by Islamabad High Court.

The section 100C of the Ordinance has been subjected to frequent amendments by the legislature, which have raised significant concerns regarding its interpretation and application. Nevertheless, with this recent judgment from the Islamabad High Court, it is hoped that the lingering ambiguity surrounding section 100C of the Ordinance will be resolved, providing much-needed clarity.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.