BR100 Increased By (0.43%)
BR30 Increased By (0.38%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.28%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.15%)
BECO 6.04 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.17%)
BML 57.97 Increased By ▲ 5.22 (9.9%)
BOP 34.18 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.2%)
CNERGY 8.21 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.61%)
DCL 12.13 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-1.7%)
FCCL 54.02 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.24%)
FCSC 5.32 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.92%)
FFL 18.04 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.06%)
FNEL 1.32 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.54%)
HUMNL 11.23 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (2.09%)
KEL 8.15 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.49%)
KOSM 5.45 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.3%)
MLCF 88.89 Increased By ▲ 0.84 (0.95%)
NBP 186.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.07%)
PACE 10.90 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (1.68%)
PAEL 40.60 Increased By ▲ 0.66 (1.65%)
PIAHCLA 26.28 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.42%)
PIBTL 17.39 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.4%)
PPL 232.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-0.08%)
PRL 34.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.14%)
PTC 66.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.76 (-1.12%)
SEARL 91.58 Increased By ▲ 0.65 (0.71%)
SSGC 27.20 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.11%)
TELE 8.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.23%)
THCCL 64.52 Increased By ▲ 4.39 (7.3%)
TPLP 9.17 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (4.68%)
TREET 24.75 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (0.86%)
TRG 72.80 Increased By ▲ 1.05 (1.46%)
WAVES 10.76 Increased By ▲ 0.78 (7.82%)
WTL 1.27 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.79%)

The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) on Saturday issued a cautionary notice to undertakings that enter into prohibited agreements without seeking prior exemption, warning of financial penalties up to Rs75 million or 10% of annual turnover.

The CCP said it had observed that certain agreements between undertakings and their wholesalers, dealers, agents, and retailers might constitute a refusal to deal with non-dealers and often include restrictive provisions that could violate Section 4(2) of the Competition Act, 2010.

“These potentially anti-competitive clauses may include resale price maintenance, market division, non-compete obligations, or other conditions that restrict competition.

“Such vertical agreements — those between parties operating at different levels of the supply chain — are void ab initio as they prevent, restrict, or distort competition, unless specifically exempted by the CCP under Section 5 read with Section 9 of the Act,” the commission said in its statement.

Rs44bn penalty on sugar mills: CAT remands case to CCP for rehearing

The statement further said exemption applications submitted to the CCP were evaluated using the criteria in Section 9 of the Act.

“Agreements that promote production or distribution, encourage technical or economic progress, or result in efficiency gains that outweigh any adverse impact on competition may be granted exemption.”

The CCP advised all undertakings to apply for an exemption under Section 5 before entering into any such agreements to avoid potential sanctions.

Under the Competition Act, 2010, the CCP is empowered to ensure free competition across all sectors of the economy, aiming to enhance economic efficiency and protect consumers from anti-competitive practices such as abuse of dominance, cartelisation, deceptive marketing, and mergers that may reduce market competition.

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.