AIRLINK 184.92 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-0.15%)
BOP 9.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-3.22%)
CNERGY 7.26 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.41%)
FCCL 36.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.57%)
FFL 14.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-1.31%)
FLYNG 24.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.64 (-2.57%)
HUBC 126.41 Decreased By ▼ -0.42 (-0.33%)
HUMNL 12.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-2.07%)
KEL 4.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.69%)
KOSM 5.94 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.98%)
MLCF 42.27 Decreased By ▼ -0.62 (-1.45%)
OGDC 198.51 Increased By ▲ 3.07 (1.57%)
PACE 6.08 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-3.34%)
PAEL 37.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.55%)
PIAHCLA 17.09 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.12%)
PIBTL 7.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.64%)
POWER 9.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-1.81%)
PPL 168.09 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.12%)
PRL 32.75 Decreased By ▼ -1.27 (-3.73%)
PTC 22.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.4%)
SEARL 101.88 Decreased By ▼ -2.09 (-2.01%)
SILK 1.07 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-10.08%)
SSGC 35.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.42 (-1.17%)
SYM 17.92 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-0.99%)
TELE 8.17 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.87%)
TPLP 11.70 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.6%)
TRG 66.12 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.06%)
WAVESAPP 11.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-2.8%)
WTL 1.53 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.66%)
YOUW 3.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.52%)
BR100 11,609 Increased By 39.9 (0.34%)
BR30 34,116 Increased By 81.8 (0.24%)
KSE100 110,323 Increased By 21.8 (0.02%)
KSE30 34,411 Increased By 24.5 (0.07%)

LAHORE: A State-Owned Enterprise (SOE) has challenged a blatant disregard for the law by the tax department for adopting coercive measures against it, issuing recovery notices without following the mandatory procedure of constituting an Alternative Dispute Resolution Committee (ADRC).

The SOE had approached the relevant appellate forum, seeking a direction against the department to refrain from initiating or taking any coercive recovery measures in respect of default surcharge amount against it till the constitution of the ARDC.

The Income Tax Ordinance 2001 explicitly requires the tax authorities to constitute an ADRC to resolve disputes with state-owned enterprises. However, the tax department has been flouting this provision, resorting to strong-arm tactics to recover taxes.

The appellate forum maintained that it is not in dispute that pursuant to Section 134-A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, read with Section 47A(2) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, duly amended by Finance Act, 2024, a mechanism has been provided for SOE to approach FBR in respect of adverse orders passed by the Inland Revenue Department under both these fiscal laws. The most significant and the relevant amendment made, which is fully applicable to the dispute, is that now it is mandatory for SOE to go for ADR, whereas the limit of Rs50 million is also not applicable. Earlier, the management of an SOE was reluctant to go for mediation in any business transaction due to fear of prosecution, but through newly amended provisions, they have been protected from any suit, prosecution or other legal proceedings. Since referral to ADR is now mandatory for SOE, a right to appeal has also been provided to SOE when matter is not decided by ADRC within the stipulated period.

The affected state-owned enterprises have been left with no choice but to approach the courts, seeking relief against the unlawful actions of the tax department. The courts have taken a dim view of the tax department’s actions, directing them to withdraw the recovery notices and follow the due process of law.

Tax experts are of the view that it is imperative that the tax department respects the law and follows the established procedures to avoid such confrontations in the future.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Comments

Comments are closed.