BML 4.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.63%)
BOP 12.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-2.14%)
CNERGY 7.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.98%)
CPHL 83.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.66 (-0.78%)
DCL 13.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.31%)
DGKC 171.35 Decreased By ▼ -1.99 (-1.15%)
FCCL 45.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.70 (-1.5%)
FFL 15.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.25%)
GCIL 26.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.37 (-1.39%)
HUBC 147.70 Decreased By ▼ -2.69 (-1.79%)
KEL 5.38 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (2.09%)
KOSM 6.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.94%)
LOTCHEM 20.76 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
MLCF 83.72 Decreased By ▼ -1.72 (-2.01%)
NBP 125.98 Decreased By ▼ -2.87 (-2.23%)
PAEL 41.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.55 (-1.31%)
PIAHCLA 21.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-1.53%)
PIBTL 9.76 Decreased By ▼ -0.33 (-3.27%)
POWER 14.00 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.43%)
PPL 163.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.1%)
PREMA 41.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-0.67%)
PRL 32.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.47 (-1.43%)
PTC 22.97 Decreased By ▼ -0.59 (-2.5%)
SNGP 117.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.88 (-0.75%)
SSGC 44.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.74 (-1.64%)
TELE 7.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-2.5%)
TPLP 10.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.69%)
TREET 23.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.61 (-2.54%)
TRG 56.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.38 (-0.67%)
WTL 1.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.32%)
BR100 14,132 Decreased By -7 (-0.05%)
BR30 39,622 Decreased By -513.8 (-1.28%)
KSE100 138,788 Increased By 123 (0.09%)
KSE30 42,358 Increased By 5.3 (0.01%)

This is apropos three letters to the Editor by this writer carried by the newspaper on Saturday, Sunday and yesterday. We also get the opportunity to survey the white dominant areas which mainly consist of western Michigan cities like Grand Rapids, Holland, and Muskegon.

Northern Michigan, including Traverse City, Petoskey, and the Upper Peninsula cities like Marquette, is overwhelmingly White. Central Michigan cities such as Midland and Mount Pleasant, as well as Detroit’s western suburbs like Livonia and Novi, are also predominantly White.

The first thing which could not escape our notice was the White-dominated areas typically benefit from better landscapes, beautification efforts, and civic amenities. When we asked the same questions to White populations, instead of reacting with fear or hesitation, they readily stepped out of their doors, listened attentively, and answered each question with ease.

They expressed their opinions with a broad smile, freely criticizing either Trump or Harris, Democrats or Republicans, without reservation. They discussed any issue under the sun without any fear of intimidation or reprisal. This stark contrast prompted me to seek a historical context for why White Americans enjoy greater freedom of expression in the U.S.

The reason, as I discerned, lies in their historical dominance, institutional power, cultural acceptance, and less scrutiny. Since the country’s founding, White populations have held social, economic, and political power, which allowed them to shape laws and institutions that protect their voices.

Their perspectives have often been regarded as the societal norm, granting them broader acceptance and significantly less pushback compared to minority groups. Additionally, White Americans face less scrutiny and fewer legal consequences when expressing controversial views, and their economic advantages provide them greater access to platforms for free speech, reinforcing their privileged position in public discourse.

Although the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits laws that curb freedom of speech, expression, or opinion, this protection seems to disproportionately favor White Americans, as other communities often do not experience the same freedoms in practice.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Qamar Bashir

The writer is a former Press Secretary to the President, An ex-Press Minister at Embassy of Pakistan to France, a former MD, SRBC Macomb, Detroit, Michigan

Comments

Comments are closed.