AGL 38.18 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-0.57%)
AIRLINK 142.98 Increased By ▲ 7.98 (5.91%)
BOP 5.07 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.39%)
CNERGY 3.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.53%)
DCL 7.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.4%)
DFML 44.48 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.07%)
DGKC 76.25 Decreased By ▼ -1.15 (-1.49%)
FCCL 26.95 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.26%)
FFBL 52.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.97 (-1.83%)
FFL 8.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.23%)
HUBC 125.51 Increased By ▲ 1.71 (1.38%)
HUMNL 9.99 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.5%)
KEL 3.74 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.27%)
KOSM 8.15 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.87%)
MLCF 34.75 Increased By ▲ 1.05 (3.12%)
NBP 58.71 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (0.38%)
OGDC 154.50 Increased By ▲ 4.55 (3.03%)
PAEL 25.15 Increased By ▲ 0.45 (1.82%)
PIBTL 5.93 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.37%)
PPL 118.31 Increased By ▲ 6.66 (5.97%)
PRL 24.38 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (2.01%)
PTC 12.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.83%)
SEARL 56.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.89 (-1.56%)
TELE 7.05 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.71%)
TOMCL 34.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.46%)
TPLP 6.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.99%)
TREET 13.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.27%)
TRG 46.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.28%)
UNITY 26.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.31%)
WTL 1.21 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BR100 8,822 Increased By 86.7 (0.99%)
BR30 26,723 Increased By 466.7 (1.78%)
KSE100 83,532 Increased By 810.2 (0.98%)
KSE30 26,710 Increased By 328 (1.24%)

It’s been almost two months since the SLA, and there is no update on when Pakistan’s program would be approved by the Fund’s board. Given the current situation, the board meeting will likely not take place in September.

The issue pertains to gross financing gaps where the reliance of both Pakistan authorities and the IMF is on friendly countries—mainly China and Saudi Arabia. The game started with arranging the incremental financing of $2 billion in FY25 and $3 billion in FY26 and FY27. Three countries—China, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE—are now raising concerns about the rollover of $12-16 billion, which we had believed would be straightforward during the SLA period.

Now, game theory is in play. If A country needs finance, that country is to carry the risk of B country not rolling over the existing loans, and that is making A country’s incremental money stuck, as the existing loans are deemed to be stuck. A is waiting for B to move, and B is looking at A.

The IMF finds itself torn between the two.

China is not pleased with Pakistan the way things have been for the last three years or so. Some Chinese circles now perceive Pakistan as an unreliable partner. That is making Saudi Arabia uncomfortable in terms of arranging additional financing.

When the IMF signed the SBA in 2023, it assumed that Pakistan’s debt was sustainable. Even with restricted imports, pending dividend payments, over 30 percent inflation, and a dire global financial situation, the IMF considered Pakistan’s debt sustainable.

All these indicators have improved significantly. If the Pakistani external debt was sustainable then, it should be sustainable now. And if it is not sustainable today, how could it be sustainable back then? That is why both the IMF and Pakistan authorities are working hard to obtain gross financing and rollovers.

Thus far, there has been minimal success in this endeavor. Some commentators are easily drawing connections between the current domestic political situation, the establishment’s dealings with the PTI, and the way PMLN leader Ishaq Dar is once again blaming the IMF for delaying the disbursement to Pakistan. It’s a déjà vu - of 2023.

Dar’s statement is not at all responsible; it’s divergent from reality and not in the best interest of the country, which desperately needs the IMF program to ensure debt sustainability. Here one can smell politics.

This coincides with a softening of the establishment’s stance towards the PTI, as evidenced by their decision to allow the party to hold a Jalsa on Sunday. The recent press conference’s language also suggests a softening of the establishment’s stance towards the PTI. This may also have something to do with friendly countries potentially demanding political stability before proceeding further.

Whatever the case is, the IMF is delayed. The situation will remain fluid until the money comes in.

Comments

200 characters
KU Sep 10, 2024 12:04pm
Altruism it is, not by IMF but our own govt. Less mentioned reasons are political persecution n reluctance to reforms that IMF has its reservations with. Rule by fear is challenged by national anger.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Toy Soldier Sep 10, 2024 02:16pm
Is default on the horizon?
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Aamir Sep 10, 2024 03:46pm
IMF should not lend a penny and demand substantial cuts in govt and defense expenditures upfront. Also up front privatizations before release of installments
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
M M Alam Sep 10, 2024 04:25pm
We must restructure our external debt and get 50 pct haircut. Debt burden is simply not sustainable. Default is not a big issue. It’s like a psychological fear of being hospitalized.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Black Panther Sep 10, 2024 07:07pm
IMF please do not bail out the corrupt elite. Let us default, crash and grab the collars of our leaders first. Only you can do it just like enabling the long pending tax on agriculture income.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Anas Sep 11, 2024 01:37am
@Black Panther, Agreed. Also I dont know why overseas pakistanis are sending so much money to a govt of corrupt elites. That is also a huge contributor helping the govt to maintain status quo.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Zulfikar Thaver Sep 11, 2024 10:28am
It is unwise of Dar to make such a statement
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply