BR100 Increased By (0.01%)
BR30 Increased By (0.53%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.28%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.29%)
AGHA 6.38 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.95%)
BECO 4.35 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.87%)
BML 62.55 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.16%)
BOP 31.39 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.51%)
CNERGY 11.73 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.21%)
CSIL 5.91 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (3.32%)
FCCL 61.71 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.28%)
FFL 14.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-1.53%)
FNEL 1.24 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.81%)
KEL 6.32 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.96%)
KOSM 5.90 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (6.12%)
LOTCHEM 24.69 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.04%)
MLCF 103.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.14%)
NBP 173.32 Decreased By ▼ -1.96 (-1.12%)
NCPL 51.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.94 (-1.78%)
NPL 54.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.17%)
OGDC 315.87 Increased By ▲ 2.48 (0.79%)
PACE 9.26 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.65%)
PAEL 35.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-0.61%)
PIBTL 13.66 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.41%)
PPL 226.07 Increased By ▲ 4.26 (1.92%)
PRL 80.28 Increased By ▲ 1.20 (1.52%)
PTC 46.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.45%)
SSGC 23.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.21%)
TBL 9.24 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.75%)
TELE 7.55 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (2.17%)
TPL 24.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-2.27%)
TPLP 12.99 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (3.84%)
TREET 25.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-1.03%)
TRG 53.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.21%)

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC), Tuesday, sought replies from the government and the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) in a petition challenging the installation of firewall and internet disruption.

A single bench of Chief Justice Aamer Farooq conducted hearing of the petition filed by senior journalist Hamid Mir against the nationwide internet slowdown.

In the petition filed through Advocate Imaan Zainab Mazari, Mir had sought redressal for the violations of citizens’ fundamental rights due to the apparent installation of a firewall, drastically reduced internet speeds, routine network disruptions, and the federal government’s denial of these issues.

Justice Aamer said that he would seek details on the matter before issuing any orders and asked whether the PTA or the Ministry of Information Technology and Telecommunication should be questioned over slow internet speed.

At this, Mir’s counsel Mazari responded that the PTA has remained silent on the matter so far. Then the judge asked whether to summon the PTA’s secretary or joint secretary, at which, Mazari requested the court to summon senior officials of the ministries concerned.

Later, the bench sought responses from the government and the PTA and deferred the hearing till August 26.

In his petition, Mir had requested that the court declare that there can be no installation of any firewall that impacts citizens’ fundamental rights without, at the very least, extensive consultative process/ consultations/ deliberations with all relevant stakeholders and keeping in view Constitutional safeguards for fundamental rights.

The petition further requested that the court declare access to the internet and the right to connectivity a fundamental right under Pakistan’s Constitutional scheme, adding that “only reasonable restrictions on the same may be imposed by law and keeping in view the principles of necessity and proportionality”.

The petition also requested that the respondents may submit reports detailing information on the “firewall”, and that all work on the firewall should be suspended and citizens’ uninterrupted access to internet services be restored.

In his petition, he cited Cabinet secretary, IT secretary, interior secretary, PTA, and the Ministry of Human Rights as respondents.

The petitioner also requested a detailed report from these respondents regarding the firewall installation and its implications.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.