BR100 Decreased By (-0.25%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.64%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.41%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.67%)
BECO 5.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-3.81%)
BML 58.03 Increased By ▲ 5.28 (10.01%)
BOP 33.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.40 (-1.17%)
CNERGY 8.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.12%)
DCL 11.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-4.62%)
FCCL 53.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.54 (-1%)
FCSC 5.40 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (3.45%)
FFL 17.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.78%)
FNEL 1.31 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.77%)
HUMNL 11.06 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.55%)
KEL 8.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.74%)
KOSM 5.45 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.3%)
MLCF 87.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.86 (-0.98%)
NBP 184.60 Decreased By ▼ -1.88 (-1.01%)
PACE 11.62 Increased By ▲ 0.90 (8.4%)
PAEL 40.31 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (0.93%)
PIAHCLA 26.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.27%)
PIBTL 17.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-1.33%)
PPL 228.40 Decreased By ▼ -4.38 (-1.88%)
PRL 34.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-1.03%)
PTC 67.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.31%)
SEARL 91.00 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.08%)
SSGC 26.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-0.99%)
TELE 8.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.47%)
THCCL 66.14 Increased By ▲ 6.01 (10%)
TPLP 9.29 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (6.05%)
TREET 24.59 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.2%)
TRG 71.69 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.08%)
WAVES 10.98 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (10.02%)
WTL 1.28 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.59%)

LAHORE: Legal heirs of a Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited (ZTBL) defaulter failed to hide behind the plea of an expired CNIC to deny availing finance, said sources.

According to details, a predecessor had availed finance facility for seasonal inputs and buffalos after pledging his several agricultural lands as security. However, he died during the pendency of the loans and his legal heirs committed default in the repayment of the same.

They maintained that the CNIC used for processing the loans had expired at the time of availing the finance facility. They contended that prudential regulations for corporate/commercial banks published by the State Bank of Pakistan mandate that withdrawals shall not be allowed until the account holder produces an attested copy of his CNIC and fulfils other formalities for activation of the account. Since the finance was availed against an expired CNIC, therefore, the finance facility was void and the ZTBL was not entitled to lodge any claim for such finance.

But the bank brushed aside the contention of the legal heirs, saying that they have not denied that their predecessor had repaid partial payment towards the loans in his life. It further added that Prudential Regulations relied upon by them pertained to the operation of a customer bank account, and not the loan. The bank management also stressed that the legal heirs of the deceased defaulter have tried to hide behind an expired CNIC but they could not deny that their predecessor had accepted the finance by his conduct.

According to the bank management, even if it is assumed that CNIC was expired, the matter was mere oversight and it could be cured by obtaining a valid copy of the same. But it could not bring down the entire finance, disbursed and availed during a valid transaction. The bank further pointed out that if there was no loan against the predecessor then there was neither any compulsion nor pressure on the deceased to make partial repayment in his life despite an expired CNIC. The relevant forums also favoured the bank point of view and directed the legal heirs to repay the loans.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.