BR100 Decreased By (-0.67%)
BR30 Decreased By (-1.27%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.52%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.51%)
AGHA 6.70 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.3%)
BECO 4.37 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BML 56.15 Decreased By ▼ -1.17 (-2.04%)
BOP 30.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-0.63%)
CNERGY 12.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-1.3%)
CSIL 5.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.29%)
FCCL 52.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.54 (-1.02%)
FFL 14.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.88%)
FNEL 1.12 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KEL 6.11 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.33%)
KOSM 6.03 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (5.24%)
LOTCHEM 26.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.79%)
MLCF 91.49 Decreased By ▼ -1.67 (-1.79%)
NBP 164.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-0.22%)
NCPL 53.85 Decreased By ▼ -1.81 (-3.25%)
NPL 58.71 Decreased By ▼ -2.45 (-4.01%)
OGDC 314.00 Decreased By ▼ -2.73 (-0.86%)
PACE 9.89 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.2%)
PAEL 35.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.49 (-1.38%)
PIBTL 14.68 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PPL 222.35 Decreased By ▼ -4.56 (-2.01%)
PRL 91.20 Decreased By ▼ -1.82 (-1.96%)
PTC 59.14 Decreased By ▼ -1.12 (-1.86%)
SSGC 23.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.56 (-2.35%)
TBL 8.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.34%)
TELE 7.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.28%)
TPL 22.11 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-1.07%)
TPLP 12.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.35 (-2.7%)
TREET 21.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.35 (-1.58%)
TRG 56.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-0.46%)

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Vice-Chairman Shah Mahmood Qureshi prayed before the Supreme Court to grant him post-arrest bail in the cypher case.

The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on November 8 had dismissed the former foreign minister’s bail plea. Qureshi, on Monday, filed an appeal against the IHC’s order under Article 185(3) of the constitution through advocate Syed Muhammad Ali Bukhari.

Bukhari submitted that the impugned order has failed to take into consideration that the liberty of the petitioner is not being protected as guaranteed by the constitution.

The impugned order is arbitrary, capricious, contradictory, and passed in undue haste on the part of the courts below. He said that the petitioner is ready to furnish reasonable surety to the satisfaction of this court and also undertakes not to abscond or tamper with the prosecution witnesses.

The IHC has erroneously observed that the case in hand is a case of death and (14) years to the exclusion of Section 5 (3) (b) where maximum liability is a fine or two years’ imprisonment. It is only after the recording of the evidence that it can be ascertained as to which punishment, if at all, is attracted to the instant case.

The entire prosecution’s argument is premised on the retention of the cypher, but it is pertinent to highlight that the petitioner’s copy was returned and the petitioner never made an unlawful statement or use of the cypher which would warrant an offence under the Official Secrets Act.

The investigating agency has, without due consideration, implicated the petitioner in a matter that, by no reasonable standard, establishes any wrongdoing on his part. To establish an offence under the Official Secrets Act, it is not sufficient merely to level accusations; there must also be concrete evidence of the “actusreus”, a fundamental element to the offence.

The petitioner neither committed the “actusreus” nor harboured the requisite “mens rea” for the alleged offences, rendering him entirely innocent of any wrongdoing or criminal activity.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.