AIRLINK 75.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-0.33%)
BOP 5.07 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.78%)
CNERGY 4.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-2.17%)
DFML 34.14 Increased By ▲ 1.61 (4.95%)
DGKC 88.90 Decreased By ▼ -1.45 (-1.6%)
FCCL 22.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-1%)
FFBL 33.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.52 (-1.55%)
FFL 9.96 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.8%)
GGL 11.21 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (1.45%)
HBL 114.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.09%)
HUBC 136.19 Decreased By ▼ -1.15 (-0.84%)
HUMNL 10.00 Increased By ▲ 0.47 (4.93%)
KEL 4.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-1.07%)
KOSM 4.79 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.91%)
MLCF 40.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.54 (-1.33%)
OGDC 140.01 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (0.19%)
PAEL 27.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.54%)
PIAA 25.29 Increased By ▲ 0.89 (3.65%)
PIBTL 6.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.01%)
PPL 123.98 Decreased By ▼ -1.32 (-1.05%)
PRL 27.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.58%)
PTC 14.07 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.57%)
SEARL 62.20 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (0.57%)
SNGP 72.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.83 (-1.14%)
SSGC 10.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.47%)
TELE 8.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.11%)
TPLP 11.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-1.96%)
TRG 66.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.15%)
UNITY 25.88 Increased By ▲ 0.73 (2.9%)
WTL 1.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-2.78%)
BR100 7,807 Increased By 4.5 (0.06%)
BR30 25,703 Decreased By -113.1 (-0.44%)
KSE100 74,515 Decreased By -15.7 (-0.02%)
KSE30 23,985 Increased By 30.3 (0.13%)

LAHORE: Chairman PTI Imran Khan has approached the Lahore High Court against a de facto ban on the coverage of all material relating to him on the electronic media.

The petitioner through his counsel contended that there is a misconceived ban airing/broadcasting of any content regarding the petitioner.

He said that the fact of the ban is obvious from viewing the television screens where anchorpersons uttering the petitioner’s name are censored and his name and images are removed.

It pleads that the de facto ban is a misconceived purported implementation of a general directive to the television channels issued by the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra), which has not been communicated to the petitioner.

He argued that the impugned ban curbs the fundamental rights of the petitioner and also denies him the opportunity to publicly express his views to his party workers and the general public.

He, therefore, asked the court to declare the impugned ban on the coverage of the petitioner unconstitutional.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed.