AVN 47.23 Decreased By ▼ -2.70 (-5.41%)
BAFL 29.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-0.8%)
BOP 3.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-1.08%)
CNERGY 3.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-4.19%)
DFML 9.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-2.63%)
DGKC 47.69 Increased By ▲ 1.04 (2.23%)
EPCL 43.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.35 (-0.8%)
FCCL 11.87 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.76%)
FFL 5.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-2.84%)
FLYNG 5.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.58%)
GGL 9.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.91%)
HUBC 67.87 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (0.28%)
HUMNL 5.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.74%)
KAPCO 22.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.32%)
KEL 1.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.1%)
LOTCHEM 27.34 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (1.22%)
MLCF 27.84 Increased By ▲ 1.36 (5.14%)
NETSOL 70.33 Decreased By ▼ -2.28 (-3.14%)
OGDC 74.11 Decreased By ▼ -1.49 (-1.97%)
PAEL 9.61 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.21%)
PIBTL 3.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-1.28%)
PPL 56.82 Decreased By ▼ -1.78 (-3.04%)
PRL 13.96 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.27%)
SILK 1.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.9%)
SNGP 40.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-1.38%)
TELE 6.37 Decreased By ▼ -0.33 (-4.93%)
TPLP 11.67 Decreased By ▼ -0.63 (-5.12%)
TRG 90.20 Decreased By ▼ -2.43 (-2.62%)
UNITY 12.36 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (1.31%)
WTL 1.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.9%)
BR100 4,098 Decreased By -16.1 (-0.39%)
BR30 13,852 Decreased By -122.9 (-0.88%)
KSE100 40,965 Decreased By -65.1 (-0.16%)
KSE30 14,532 Decreased By -43.8 (-0.3%)
Follow us

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) has stayed the handing over of 45267 acres of state land on lease to the army for corporate agriculture farming. The land in question is situated in districts of Bhakkar, Khushab and Sahiwal.

The court passed this order in a public interest petition of Public Interest Law Association of Pakistan and sought replies from the respondents on May 09.

The petitioner’s counsel contended that the Punjab Colonies Department issued a notification for handing over the land to the army under section 10 of the Colonization of Government Lands (Punjab) Act 1912.

Corporate farming: Punjab BoR asked to hand over 45,267 acres of state land to army

He argued that the impugned notification was illegal as the caretaker government of the province was not vested with any power to sanction it. He said the scope of the caretaker government was limited to perform day-to-day functions of the province.

He pointed out that grant of state land for a period of 30 years was a decision of permanent nature, which could not have been taken by the caretaker government.

He said the exercise of powers under section 10 of the Colonization Act did not fall under any of the categories of permissible actions by the caretaker government.

He said the purported handing over of the state land was also in violation of the Doctrine of Public Trust.

The counsel argued that there was no provision in the Pakistan Army Act, 1952 which authorized or empowered the army to undertake any activity beyond its composition for the purposes of welfare unless the federal government expressly granted permission to do so.

He maintained that the army had no jurisdiction to directly or indirectly engage in business ventures of any nature outside its composition no to claim any state land for corporate agriculture farming.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

1000 characters
Abdullah Apr 01, 2023 11:22am
Later on the army would say project was not useful.Lets make a DHA here also.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Adnan Aziz Apr 01, 2023 02:47pm
Great! Please stick to this decision.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply

Corporate farming: LHC stays handing over of land to army

Govt to share budget details with IMF to unlock funds: Dar

IK urges SC to ‘save democracy’

IK ‘reveals’ Rana’s ‘plot’

Cabinet may ratify deal between UPL, govt entities

Accumulated profits: Proposed advance tax may be challenged in courts

Transportation of HSD: APL proposes to repurpose its Hub-ZOT pipeline

Republicans, Biden reach debt ceiling deal

SRO on ‘records of beneficial owners’ irks PBC

PBS statement full of mistakes: economist

WB terms one component of KWSSIP ‘high risk’