BR100 Increased By (1.24%)
BR30 Increased By (1.33%)
KSE100 Increased By (1.2%)
KSE30 Increased By (1.26%)
AGHA 7.87 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.55%)
BECO 5.23 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.77%)
BML 59.80 Increased By ▲ 1.14 (1.94%)
BOP 34.36 Increased By ▲ 0.67 (1.99%)
CNERGY 10.93 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (3.02%)
CSIL 5.30 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FCCL 54.45 Increased By ▲ 0.71 (1.32%)
FFL 16.84 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (2.31%)
FNEL 1.23 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.82%)
KEL 7.45 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (2.34%)
KOSM 5.72 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.42%)
LOTCHEM 30.05 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (1.35%)
MLCF 97.29 Increased By ▲ 0.93 (0.97%)
NBP 206.15 Increased By ▲ 2.62 (1.29%)
NCPL 57.87 Increased By ▲ 1.02 (1.79%)
NPL 68.87 Increased By ▲ 1.56 (2.32%)
OGDC 321.40 Increased By ▲ 3.18 (1%)
PACE 10.80 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (1.6%)
PAEL 42.45 Increased By ▲ 0.68 (1.63%)
PIBTL 17.00 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.13%)
PPL 223.67 Increased By ▲ 3.50 (1.59%)
PRL 52.89 Increased By ▲ 3.84 (7.83%)
PTC 71.00 Increased By ▲ 0.99 (1.41%)
SSGC 29.60 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (1.58%)
TBL 9.82 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.51%)
TELE 8.94 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.36%)
TPL 17.30 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.76%)
TPLP 12.77 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (2.08%)
TREET 22.89 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (1.33%)
TRG 60.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-0.37%)

ISLAMABAD: The Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP) has declared that the registered intermediaries are legally bound to ensure compliance with the anti-money laundering (AML) laws.

In this connection, the SECP has issued an order against a registered law firm, which is also registered as an intermediary under the Intermediaries Regulations framed under the Companies Act.

The said law firm has violated Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2010 (the AML Act) and AML/CFT Sanctions Rules, 2020 (the AML Rules).

An SECP official informed that the Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2010, places compliance obligations on the company service providers (intermediaries) to conduct customer due diligence and report suspicious transactions to Financial Monitoring Unit. The intermediaries while performing their functions, shall ensure that their clients are not involved in any illegal or suspicious activities, implying money laundering or terrorist financing.

Further, the intermediaries shall also ensure that the client is not placed on the United Nations Security Council’s (UNSC) list of designated persons or entities linked to terrorist financing or against whom a ban, sanction or embargo subsists, the official added. According to the order of the Director/Head of Wing (Adjudication-I) SECP, apart from being a registered Law Firm, the Respondent, is also registered as an intermediary under the Intermediaries Regulations, framed under the Companies Act, 2017 (the law administered by the Commission). Moreover, in terms of the Intermediaries Regulations, a registered intermediary is required to ensure compliance with AML laws. Thus, the respondent’s stance that the Commission went beyond its jurisdiction conferred upon it by the SECP Act and issued a show cause notice to a law firm is not tenable. The respondent is a registered entity and falls under the ambit of the Commission to the extent of its business with regard to Intermediary Services, SECP order added.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.