BAFL 45.31 Increased By ▲ 0.51 (1.14%)
BIPL 20.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.73 (-3.48%)
BOP 5.61 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (6.25%)
CNERGY 4.60 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (4.07%)
DFML 15.82 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.06%)
DGKC 73.45 Increased By ▲ 2.14 (3%)
FABL 27.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.48 (-1.73%)
FCCL 16.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-1.79%)
FFL 8.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-2.63%)
GGL 12.69 Decreased By ▼ -0.47 (-3.57%)
HBL 111.18 Decreased By ▼ -2.22 (-1.96%)
HUBC 119.71 Decreased By ▼ -2.19 (-1.8%)
HUMNL 7.37 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-7.18%)
KEL 3.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-3.56%)
LOTCHEM 27.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.47 (-1.68%)
MLCF 39.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-0.74%)
OGDC 108.10 Decreased By ▼ -1.17 (-1.07%)
PAEL 17.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.60 (-3.28%)
PIBTL 5.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-3.31%)
PIOC 106.48 Decreased By ▼ -3.52 (-3.2%)
PPL 92.12 Decreased By ▼ -1.49 (-1.59%)
PRL 25.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.56%)
SILK 1.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-3.77%)
SNGP 63.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.39 (-0.61%)
SSGC 11.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.41 (-3.35%)
TELE 8.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.55 (-6.19%)
TPLP 13.18 Decreased By ▼ -0.72 (-5.18%)
TRG 84.75 Decreased By ▼ -1.05 (-1.22%)
UNITY 25.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.8%)
WTL 1.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-4.38%)
BR100 6,185 Decreased By -45.4 (-0.73%)
BR30 21,452 Decreased By -287.1 (-1.32%)
KSE100 60,502 Decreased By -228.3 (-0.38%)
KSE30 20,175 Decreased By -64.2 (-0.32%)
BR Research MLCF (Maple Leaf Cement Factory Limited) 39.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.74%

DGKC & MLCF: Fair warning

Here is a direct quote from the financial reportof prominent cement player DG Khan Cement (PSX: DKGC) for the first...
Published March 3, 2023

Here is a direct quote from the financial report of prominent cement player DG Khan Cement (PSX: DKGC) for the first half of the current fiscal year; it goes: “Sales [] registered growth primarily due to stable local cement prices. [The] whole effect of inflation, high energy and fuel prices could not be passed on to the consumers”. The company is referring to its 8 percent revenue growth—which granted is not as high as some other cement players—but is reasonably positive compared to the company’s volumetric decline of 20 percent. The reason for that growth, though, is not “stable” prices. Its jerky prices, with big jumps over very short periods of time.

Cement prices have had quite a journey over the last year. Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS)’ weekly price indices suggest on average, cement price during the Jul to Dec period (of FY23) was about 46 percent higher than average weekly prices in the same period last year. DGKC’s own revenue per ton sold (estimated using its revenue and volumetric dispatches numbers) shows the increase in price in 1HFY23 compared to the same period last year was 36 percent.

In contrast, Mapleleaf Cement (PSX: MLCF) that was behind DGKC last year is at least a shoulder ahead with lower decline in dispatches (down 12%), a higher revenue growth of 36 percent, brought on by robust pricing. Revenue per ton sold for the company rose 55 percent during the period.

It is evident that while DGKC actually couldn’t pass on the effect of higher cost inflation on the pricing it landed on, when many others like MLCF very well could. DGKC’s cost per ton sold rose 41 percent, vs. the 49 percent increase recorded by MLCF—the difference is, MLCF sold at better average prices. One very obvious reason is that DGKC also supplies to the southern markets where prices have remained lower than northern prices, while MLCF is entirely located in the north where the company targets its supply. Comparatively, gross margins for MLCF are much higher at 29 percent vs. DGKC’s 14 percent. The company has reduced reliance on grid electricity by investing in captive power

Though DGKC’s overheads and other charges declined, down to 4 percent of revenue from 6 percent last year in 1HFY22, and much lower than previous years when clinker sales were higher and more coal was being imported from abroad, its finance costs are atrociously high at 11 percent of revenue. Comparatively, last year, finance costs as a share of revenue were nearly half at 6 percent. Higher borrowing and rising interest rates have caused finance costs to balloon.

In contrast, MLCF’s finance costs remained in check at 4 percent. Whereas MLCF’s profits rose nearly 50 percent in 1HFY23, DGKC’s earnings declined about the same (down 57%) due to a bigger drop in dispatches, lower retention compared to other players, and higher expenses.

The second half of the year may not be dramatically different. Additional FED on cement will further increase end-user prices for buyers and over the rest of the year, continue to hurt demand which is already affected by PSDP cuts, flood related construction halts and reduced buying power.

This will put further pressure on companies like DGKC but also MLCF as there is only so much that strong pricing can do in a market starved for offtake. Utilization is already low for the entire cement industry based on its capacity which is on its way to increasing. Though many expect flood related rehabilitation to boost demand, it remains to be seen how soon that would materialize.


Comments are closed.

DGKC & MLCF: Fair warning

Policy envisages transformation of non-strategic SOEs

$3bn deposit: SFD extends term for one year

Operation of SRO about additional tax on banks’ windfall income suspended

PM, Kuwait’s Crown Prince agree to deepen bilateral ties

Defaulters’ utility connections to be cut: FBR starts serving notices with 30-day compliance time

FBR resolves Sino-Pak ‘trade gap’ issue

Defaulters of govt dues, utility bills: ECP takes major decision ahead of nomination-filing

Recycling of ships: Accession to ‘Hong Kong Convention’ approved

Carbon credit sharing: PPIB seeks MoCC’s nod

At the rate of Rs3.53/unit for Oct 2023: Nepra agrees to allow Discos to recover Rs32.7bn additional amount