BAFL 38.85 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.26%)
BIPL 15.78 Increased By ▲ 0.72 (4.78%)
BOP 3.71 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.92%)
CNERGY 2.98 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (1.02%)
DFML 16.36 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (1.87%)
DGKC 44.63 Increased By ▲ 1.23 (2.83%)
FABL 21.84 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (1.87%)
FCCL 11.02 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (2.13%)
FFL 5.92 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.72%)
GGL 9.18 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.88%)
HBL 96.26 Increased By ▲ 0.76 (0.8%)
HUBC 84.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.08%)
HUMNL 5.71 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.18%)
KEL 1.90 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.53%)
LOTCHEM 25.57 Increased By ▲ 0.44 (1.75%)
MLCF 29.78 Increased By ▲ 1.28 (4.49%)
OGDC 95.54 Increased By ▲ 0.44 (0.46%)
PAEL 9.59 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (2.79%)
PIBTL 3.64 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PIOC 85.62 Increased By ▲ 0.67 (0.79%)
PPL 72.40 Increased By ▲ 0.68 (0.95%)
PRL 15.07 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (1.96%)
SILK 0.96 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-3.03%)
SNGP 45.59 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (0.91%)
SSGC 9.08 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TELE 6.93 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.76%)
TPLP 12.42 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.81%)
TRG 90.16 Increased By ▲ 0.61 (0.68%)
UNITY 24.34 Increased By ▲ 0.94 (4.02%)
WTL 1.15 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BR100 4,639 Increased By 56.2 (1.23%)
BR30 16,478 Increased By 197.6 (1.21%)
KSE100 46,202 Increased By 312.6 (0.68%)
KSE30 16,207 Increased By 120.5 (0.75%)

ISLAMABAD: The Sindh High Court (SHC) has declared that the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) is fully empowered to transfer officers of audit cadre in Inland Revenue Department anywhere in the field formations including special duty without any assignment.

The SHC has issued an order against the auditors of the FBR who have challenged the FBR’s order that the auditors (petitioners) shall not be posted as Unit In-charge in field formations and shall not be assigned assessment-related functions and duties.

The petitioners (auditors) have primarily impugned letter dated 25.02.2022, as well as, a paragraph of notification dated 28.10.2015 pursuant to which it has been clarified by the FBR that the officers of audit cadre in Inland Revenue Department (petitioners herein) shall not be posted as Unit In-charge in field formations and shall not be assigned assessment-related functions and duties.

Petitioners being assistant directors in the Audit department are also officers of Inland Revenue; hence, entitled and eligible to exercise all such powers as are otherwise conferred upon other officers of Inland Revenue Department, auditors contested. On the other hand, the counsel appearing for the FBR submits that the impugned letter and notification are purely administrative in nature, whereas, they relate to the terms and conditions of service of the petitioners; hence the petitions are incompetent. He has further argued that the FBR has the responsibility to oversee the administrative affairs; whereas, the impugned decision has been taken with consultation of Federation Public Service Commission; therefore, no case is made out. Learned Assistant Attorney General has adopted the arguments of learned counsel for the FBR.

The SHC stated that the petitioners are admittedly civil servants and perusal of Section 105 of the Civil Servants Act, 1973, reflects that every civil servant shall be liable to serve anywhere within or outside the province to any post under Government, Federal Government, or any Provincial Government or local authority, as the case may be.

There is not any concept of a vested right in posting of a civil servant who can be posted anywhere and cannot demand or seek posting or transfer at a place of his choice. It is not their right to seek a specific posting or assignment of assessment or field formation as contended. They could also be posted as officers on special duty without any assignment, and this merely, without any other plausible cause, does not by itself give a cause of action to seek enforcement of any constitutional right.

Being civil servants they are bound to obey the order of the FBR and postings so assigned for which while entering into service they had agreed; hence seeking a person specific relief for some special posting or assignment is not per-se a right, which could be enforced through this Court. They will still remain officers of Inland Revenue, even if they are not assigned any field formation or assessment related duties. In fact, they claim to be auditors; and therefore, it would be better if they remain as auditors, instead of any seeking assessment-related assignments.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022


1000 characters

FBR empowered to transfer its auditors anywhere: SHC

PTI to challenge ECP decision

PSM sell-off: Only one bidder still showing interest, says Fawad

Shamshad lists factors behind SOEs’ Rs500bn losses

For increasing remittance inflows: SBP ups cash incentives for banks, MFBs and ECs

Initially, Pakistan and GCC likely to sign FTAs on limited items

LCI to acquire approx 75.01pc shareholding of Lotte Chemical Ltd

Coal pricing mechanism: power plants, coal suppliers question Nepra’s proposed revision

Gathering of info from oil & ghee cos: SC upholds statutory powers of CCP

Minister, retailers discuss steps aimed at boosting exports

Levy of electricity duty: Under which law the notification was issued, SC asks Punjab govt