AIRLINK 72.59 Increased By ▲ 3.39 (4.9%)
BOP 4.99 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.84%)
CNERGY 4.29 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.7%)
DFML 31.71 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (1.47%)
DGKC 80.90 Increased By ▲ 3.65 (4.72%)
FCCL 21.42 Increased By ▲ 1.42 (7.1%)
FFBL 35.19 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (0.54%)
FFL 9.33 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (2.3%)
GGL 9.82 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.2%)
HBL 112.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-0.32%)
HUBC 136.50 Increased By ▲ 3.46 (2.6%)
HUMNL 7.14 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (2.73%)
KEL 4.35 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (2.84%)
KOSM 4.35 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (2.35%)
MLCF 37.67 Increased By ▲ 1.07 (2.92%)
OGDC 137.75 Increased By ▲ 4.88 (3.67%)
PAEL 23.41 Increased By ▲ 0.77 (3.4%)
PIAA 24.55 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (1.45%)
PIBTL 6.63 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (2.63%)
PPL 125.05 Increased By ▲ 8.75 (7.52%)
PRL 26.99 Increased By ▲ 1.09 (4.21%)
PTC 13.32 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (1.83%)
SEARL 52.70 Increased By ▲ 0.70 (1.35%)
SNGP 70.80 Increased By ▲ 3.20 (4.73%)
SSGC 10.54 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TELE 8.33 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.6%)
TPLP 10.95 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.39%)
TRG 60.60 Increased By ▲ 1.31 (2.21%)
UNITY 25.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.12%)
WTL 1.28 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.79%)
BR100 7,566 Increased By 157.7 (2.13%)
BR30 24,786 Increased By 749.4 (3.12%)
KSE100 71,902 Increased By 1235.2 (1.75%)
KSE30 23,595 Increased By 371 (1.6%)

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Tax Ombudsman (FTO) has warned the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) to refrain from illegal collections of income tax/withholding tax from individuals, Association of Persons (AoPs) and companies in tribal areas.

According to an order of the FTO issued against the Regional Tax Office (RTO) Peshawar, clauses (109A) and (110) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 provide that deduction or collection of withholding tax shall not apply to an individual domiciled or company and Association of person resident in tribal areas. In the instant case, the complainant’s permanent address is of North Waziristan.

The fact of the case are that the complainant being domiciled of ex-Federally Administered Tribal Area (Fata) and posted as a medical doctor at District Headquarters Hospital Miranshah, claimed that he is not liable to pay income tax under the statutory provisions of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, the FTO order said.

The RTO Peshawar responded that the tax from the salary of the complainant has been rightly deducted as he is a government employee, ie, the Government of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa. The salary income of a person, irrespective of his place of posting, is taxable under the provisions of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001. Section 101 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 clearly states salary income shall be considered Pakistan source i.e. deemed to accrue or arise in Pakistan, if it is received from any employment exercised in Pakistan, wherever paid or it is paid by any of the federal, provisional or local government of Pakistan.

Non-issuance of refund: FTO directs FBR to pay compensation to taxpayer

The FTO’s order revealed that after the merger of the said areas in the KPK/Pakistan tax laws have been fully extended to the areas in question. However, as a gesture of goodwill, the legislation has granted a grace period, whereby, all income earned through taxable activity in the said areas by the individuals domiciled in merged Fata/Pata has been exempted through clauses 145(A), 109(A) and 110 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 for a specified period. The salary individuals who are Fata/Pata domiciled and serving in the said areas are also entitled to this concessionary regime as no specific exclusion has been provided under the law.

The department, however, could not produce any provision where section 101 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 is excluded from ambit of exemption granted by federal government under clause 145(A) of Part-I of Second Schedule of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 or clause 109(A) or 110 of Part-I of the Second Schedule of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001. The intent of legislation promulgated through Income Tax Ordinance 2001 to grant relief to residents of tribal areas under clause 145(A) Part-of Second Schedule of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 to grant exemption to residents of ex-Fata/Pata. Negation of claim of exemption without affording proper opportunity of hearing to complement tantamount to maladministration as defined under the FTO Ordinance.

The FTO has directed the Chief Commissioner RTO Peshawar to dispose of application of exemption and decide the case on merit within 15 days under the explicit provisions of the clauses 145(A), 109(A) and 110 of Part-I of Second Schedule of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed.