AVN 65.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.86 (-1.3%)
BAFL 30.25 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BOP 4.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-2.11%)
CNERGY 3.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-2.99%)
DFML 13.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.60 (-4.26%)
DGKC 42.15 Decreased By ▼ -1.54 (-3.52%)
EPCL 46.13 Increased By ▲ 1.48 (3.31%)
FCCL 11.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.38 (-3.21%)
FFL 5.19 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (4.43%)
FLYNG 5.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-4.59%)
GGL 10.04 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-3.28%)
HUBC 63.21 Increased By ▲ 0.91 (1.46%)
HUMNL 5.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-2.05%)
KAPCO 27.81 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (0.94%)
KEL 2.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-2.71%)
LOTCHEM 25.37 Decreased By ▼ -1.23 (-4.62%)
MLCF 21.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.87 (-3.86%)
NETSOL 84.95 Decreased By ▼ -1.25 (-1.45%)
OGDC 86.64 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (0.43%)
PAEL 10.96 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-2.75%)
PIBTL 4.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.64%)
PPL 78.65 Decreased By ▼ -1.43 (-1.79%)
PRL 13.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.37%)
SILK 0.88 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-2.22%)
SNGP 41.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.75 (-1.8%)
TELE 6.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-3.22%)
TPLP 16.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.54%)
TRG 111.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.66 (-0.59%)
UNITY 14.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-2.37%)
WTL 1.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-5%)
BR100 4,026 Decreased By -48.6 (-1.19%)
BR30 14,402 Decreased By -123 (-0.85%)
KSE100 40,451 Decreased By -396 (-0.97%)
KSE30 15,110 Decreased By -101.7 (-0.67%)
Follow us

The outgoing fiscal year and the re-emergence of external pressures due to global commodity price spiral has once again laid bare the Achilles’ heel that is poor agri-productivity. As per, PBS, Pakistan’s cotton import bill climbed to $1.82 billion during FY22 even as the country imported half a million fewer bales compared to the preceding year.

Even though the import bill rose to its highest ever, these were not made at record prices. Pakistan imported 4.6 million bales (of 170kg) at average unit price of $2.36 per kg during FY22. Exactly ten years ago, the country had imported fiber at much steeper price of $2.84 per kg in FY12, when global commodity markets witnessed their last major boom.

Yet, the import bill in FY22 is nearly 4 times higher simply because of the sheer rise in the demand for imported variety. A decade ago, Pakistan imported just one million bales of cotton, while local production still flirted with peak levels of 14 million bales per annum. Today, as local production has dropped to 8.5 million bales, Pakistan imports 4.5 times more fiber (by volume), adding a drag of $1.5 billion on trade deficit compared to a decade ago.

In between, the country has replaced its cotton acres with substitute crops that have done relatively well, at least from farmers’ perspective. Between FY12 and FY22, cotton lost 1 million hectares of sown area, which was taken over primarily by rice, maize and sugarcane (in roughly the ratio of 60-20-20). But has the fall in cotton output (and the ensuing pressure on imports) been compensated by the gains in other crops?

FY22 may have been a special year in that records were broken, and not just by cotton. Rice exports reached a fresh high, crossing $2.5 billion for the first time. Over the last decade, Pakistan’s rice exports have increased by about $0.5 billion, spurred by increase in volume exported by nearly 1MMT. Meanwhile, maize– a fresh horse in the exports race – has reportedly added close to $0.2 billion. And although sugar export remains banned, the marketable surplus could have generated at least $0.3 billion in export earnings.

But even when put together, the collective export potential of major cotton substitute fail to add up to the drag on trade deficit caused due by higher cotton imports. The incremental rise in cotton imports over the last decade stands at $1.5 billion (on peak global prices on both occasions) against the incremental $1 billion in export earnings of rice, maize and sugar (the last of which were not realized). So, has cotton substitution been a poor bet for the economy?

That depends, if one takes into account the extent of potential import bill substituted due to higher local output of competing crops. Between FY12 and FY22, domestic maize output alone rose by 6MMT. Had the rising local demand for maize been met through imports, it would have added at least $1 billion to import bill (excluding 1MMT or $0.2 billion in exportable surplus). Similarly, although rice exports have only risen by 1MMT, local output increased by 3MMT, implying increase in domestic rice demand of 2MMT or approximately $1.5 billion. Domestic sugar output has also increased by nearly 3MMT over the last decade, which is equivalent to at least $0.6 billion in value terms.

Put together, the substitution of cotton over the last decade has arguably added output of close to $4 billion in competing crops. Although majority of additional output does not show up in foreign trade, it has most certainly resulted in import substitution, which is only partially cancelled out by $1.5 billion in cotton import bill.

Of course, had Pakistan managed to simultaneously improve its cotton productivity over time, the trade-off could have been avoided altogether. But is substitution of cotton necessarily something to bemoan?


Comments are closed.

Taha Abbasi Jul 27, 2022 03:40pm
Great analysis by the team. Cotton had been resulting in losses for many growers in the past years, due to lower yields and higher pest attacks. Its only saving grace this year was the high international prices for cotton, which spurred more local growers to sow the crop this year. However the water shortage in Sindh during early Kharif might bring a dent in the province's crop yields this year..
thumb_up Recommended (0)

Crop substitution: decade-long view

‘Plan C conspiracy’ Irked by allegation, PPP says will send legal notice to IK

LPG hits historic high of Rs300/kg: LPGA demands setting up of probe commission

50pc duty imposed on import of ‘Mild Hybrid Vehicles’

Al-Nahyan due tomorrow to discuss trade, investment

Flood-hit areas: Rs8.39bn subsidy to be provided to farmers

Pakistan expresses interest in possibility of currency swap with Russia

FBR readies presentation for IMF

Italy’s Meloni in Libya to conclude $8bn gas deal

Ogra rejects oil price speculations

Live debate on economy: Tarin accepts challenge