AGL 37.76 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.11%)
AIRLINK 176.30 Increased By ▲ 7.65 (4.54%)
BOP 9.72 Increased By ▲ 0.63 (6.93%)
CNERGY 6.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.17%)
DCL 10.08 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.3%)
DFML 40.81 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.42%)
DGKC 94.66 Increased By ▲ 1.42 (1.52%)
FCCL 39.40 Increased By ▲ 1.48 (3.9%)
FFBL 81.75 Increased By ▲ 3.03 (3.85%)
FFL 13.68 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (1.63%)
HUBC 120.99 Increased By ▲ 6.89 (6.04%)
HUMNL 15.30 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (2.34%)
KEL 5.76 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.17%)
KOSM 8.38 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.82%)
MLCF 46.90 Increased By ▲ 1.41 (3.1%)
NBP 75.00 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.11%)
OGDC 195.52 Increased By ▲ 2.59 (1.34%)
PAEL 32.24 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PIBTL 8.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-2.8%)
PPL 172.50 Increased By ▲ 5.12 (3.06%)
PRL 33.57 Increased By ▲ 2.56 (8.26%)
PTC 22.40 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (1.45%)
SEARL 102.25 Increased By ▲ 1.42 (1.41%)
TELE 8.57 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.42%)
TOMCL 35.08 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (0.69%)
TPLP 11.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.89%)
TREET 19.31 Increased By ▲ 0.68 (3.65%)
TRG 60.98 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (0.4%)
UNITY 34.00 Increased By ▲ 2.02 (6.32%)
WTL 1.63 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.24%)
BR100 11,490 Increased By 201.1 (1.78%)
BR30 35,041 Increased By 900.8 (2.64%)
KSE100 106,751 Increased By 1646.6 (1.57%)
KSE30 33,100 Increased By 545.9 (1.68%)

EDITORIAL: The Federal Shariat Court declared the prohibition of riba complete and absolute in all its forms and manifestations as per Islamic injunctions and directed the government to implement its decision by the end of calendar year 2027.

In this context, it is relevant to note that Bank of Islam Malaysia has been successfully posting profits for years by providing loans free of cost to its borrowers, identified through the application of a highly ethical process; and, without the need to take account of market fluctuations, the borrower no longer needs to constantly adjust his balance sheets, which account for lower defaults, lower non-performing assets and higher profits which are then shared with the lender bank that, in turn, shared its profits with the depositors. However, the Malaysian central bank, Bank Negara Malaysia, continues to set interest rates.

Non-performing loans (NPLs) are a source of serious concern in Pakistan, exacerbated by the decision of many Pakistani governments to implement interest-free loans/subsidised interest schemes to the poor and vulnerable, youth and/or other disadvantaged groups, however, this has an element of government subsidy and/or browbeating reluctant commercial banks to extend loans without collateral. Sadly, in these schemes there has been little application of an ethical process in identifying clients leading to failure to meet their overarching objective: alleviation of poverty.

Be that as it may, the implementation of the Federal Shariat Court decision would be a major challenge for the government on three counts. First and perhaps of most serious immediate concern is the fact that Pakistan today owes more than 130 billion dollars to foreign countries/multilaterals/commercial banks/debt equity from issuance of Sukuk/Eurobonds.

For the next five years, the country would have to register a surplus current account of 26 billion dollars each year to meet the deadline given by the Federal Shariat Court. Given that Pakistan has registered a current account surplus rarely, if ever, with the July-February 2022 deficit of 13.1 billion dollars the government may have to seek an extension in the implementation deadline at best.

An offshoot of this maybe the cessation of all linkages to the international financial market barring a few banks in Muslim countries who may hesitate due to the higher risk associated with such a delinking. While without doubt the very possibility of hot money flowing into the economy would evaporate, hot money whose summary exit is believed to be a major cause of the 1978 Asian financial crisis that caused much angst amongst the people of these countries, yet it may also inhibit foreign investors — institutional, government or private sector — from our markets.

Pakistan’s National Savings Centres give a profit and are regarded as the safest investment for those with a fixed income. This money is then credited to the government’s permanent debt profile under unfunded debt. The profit rates on these certificates are determined by: (i) the prevailing discount rate set by the SBP; and (ii) if the government requires more funds it raises the rate and in the event that the budget deficit is becoming unsustainable then it reduces the rate so as to reduce the domestic mark-up component of the budget. The government also borrows heavily from the domestic market, including through issuance of treasury bills which come with an attached interest. When the interest regime is abandoned it would be extremely difficult to claim a profit when the government budget deficit is at an unsustainable high of over 9 percent.

Second, the policy rate which is at present a critical monetary policy tool used by the State Bank of Pakistan to deal with liquidity issues impacting on inflation as well as dealing with the pressure on foreign exchange reserves due to an unsustainable current account deficit would have to be abandoned which would place the entire onus of adjustments on the rupee-dollar parity. In other words, inflation may rise well beyond the historical highs Pakistan has experienced as imported inflation would propel the rate of domestic inflation.

And finally, interest is viewed in the business world as an input, cost of capital, which determines the cost and pricing of the final product. The Federal Shariat Court’s decision would therefore require a sea change in the way businesses calculate their costs which in turn may require a re-education that may take time.

It is, therefore, critical for the government to set up a committee of domestic and international experts to thrash out the modus operandi of a riba-free society, which may serve as a model for other Islamic countries.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed.

Muhammad Abdullah May 18, 2022 06:59pm
Getting rid of riba simply means that the government will not be able to print money at will, which is the major cause of inflation. Population increase or demand is not the major cause, had that been the case inflation wouldn't have topped 13%. The currency note is basically a promissory note, when you make way too many promises by printing way too many notes, you would not be able to keep those promises and the result is in front of our eyes. A possible way for the future is to back the rupee with construction grade steel, just like government issues a wheat support price, it could issue a steel support price, if value if steel goes up in the international market then the rupee goes up. There will be no interest charged in borrowing and there will be a limited amount of borrowing. The government will reduce it's expenditure, close down unnecessary operations and spend only what it has got.
thumb_up Recommended (0)