AGL 40.01 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
AIRLINK 178.07 Decreased By ▼ -19.78 (-10%)
BOP 9.87 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-4.82%)
CNERGY 7.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-1.82%)
DCL 10.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.56 (-5.28%)
DFML 41.80 Decreased By ▼ -2.02 (-4.61%)
DGKC 105.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.67 (-0.63%)
FCCL 39.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.60 (-1.52%)
FFBL 82.05 Increased By ▲ 1.80 (2.24%)
FFL 13.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.54 (-3.82%)
HUBC 118.20 Decreased By ▼ -2.36 (-1.96%)
HUMNL 13.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.72 (-4.91%)
KEL 5.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-3.41%)
KOSM 8.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-3.15%)
MLCF 48.33 Decreased By ▼ -1.28 (-2.58%)
NBP 72.50 Decreased By ▼ -1.98 (-2.66%)
OGDC 192.50 Decreased By ▼ -4.57 (-2.32%)
PAEL 32.35 Decreased By ▼ -2.75 (-7.83%)
PIBTL 7.97 Decreased By ▼ -0.55 (-6.46%)
PPL 172.92 Decreased By ▼ -3.34 (-1.89%)
PRL 32.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-0.93%)
PTC 24.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.69 (-2.7%)
SEARL 118.71 Decreased By ▼ -2.33 (-1.92%)
TELE 9.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.39 (-3.94%)
TOMCL 35.34 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.31%)
TPLP 11.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.88 (-6.91%)
TREET 18.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.65 (-3.43%)
TRG 60.60 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (0.53%)
UNITY 38.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.02 (-2.61%)
WTL 1.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-10.93%)
BR100 11,553 Decreased By -196.7 (-1.67%)
BR30 35,353 Decreased By -818.2 (-2.26%)
KSE100 109,291 Decreased By -679.7 (-0.62%)
KSE30 33,947 Decreased By -184.2 (-0.54%)

LAHORE: A division bench of the Lahore High Court (LHC) admitted an appeal of PML-Q MPAs for hearing against a single bench of the LHC asking the Speaker National Assembly to administer oath taking to Chief Minister Hamza Shehbaz as some important issues were raised in the Intra Court Appeal.

The bench referred the appeal to the Chief Justice for constitution a larger bench for its disposal in accordance with the law after Eid holidays.

The applicant’s counsel raised the issue that neither the President of Pakistan and Governor of the Punjab were made as respondents in the constitutional petition, nor any notice of hearing was issued enabling them to controvert the contentions raised by respondent.

He said important legal and constitutional questions raised by counsel for appellants qua maintainability of constitutional petition had neither been noted nor repelled with reasons in impugned judgment.

He said since interpretation of various constitutional provisions was involved, notice was required to be issued to Attorney General of Pakistan and Advocate General of Punjab, but the mandatory provisions of law were not complied with and single bench passed the impugned judgment without due process guaranteed under Articles 4 and 10-A of the Constitution.

He said fresh constitutional petition was not competent and remedy, if any, was by way of filing contempt petition.

He also argued that High Court has no authority to nominate any specific person, including Speaker of the National Assembly, for administration of oath to the newly elected Chief Minister of the Punjab, thus the impugned judgment, being in violation of various provisions of the Constitution as well as applicable law, is unsustainable.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed.