BR100 Increased By (1.2%)
BR30 Increased By (1.12%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.76%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.76%)
AGHA 7.85 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.29%)
BECO 5.23 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.77%)
BML 57.60 Decreased By ▼ -1.06 (-1.81%)
BOP 34.39 Increased By ▲ 0.70 (2.08%)
CNERGY 10.91 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (2.83%)
CSIL 5.47 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (3.21%)
FCCL 54.99 Increased By ▲ 1.25 (2.33%)
FFL 16.79 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (2%)
FNEL 1.25 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (2.46%)
KEL 7.42 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.92%)
KOSM 5.82 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (3.19%)
LOTCHEM 29.95 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (1.01%)
MLCF 96.65 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (0.3%)
NBP 205.80 Increased By ▲ 2.27 (1.12%)
NCPL 58.70 Increased By ▲ 1.85 (3.25%)
NPL 70.30 Increased By ▲ 2.99 (4.44%)
OGDC 319.99 Increased By ▲ 1.77 (0.56%)
PACE 11.00 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (3.48%)
PAEL 43.36 Increased By ▲ 1.59 (3.81%)
PIBTL 17.08 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (1.61%)
PPL 222.56 Increased By ▲ 2.39 (1.09%)
PRL 52.20 Increased By ▲ 3.15 (6.42%)
PTC 71.80 Increased By ▲ 1.79 (2.56%)
SSGC 29.47 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (1.13%)
TBL 9.94 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (1.74%)
TELE 8.96 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.59%)
TPL 17.87 Increased By ▲ 0.70 (4.08%)
TPLP 13.10 Increased By ▲ 0.59 (4.72%)
TREET 22.95 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (1.59%)
TRG 60.48 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (0.43%)

LAHORE: A division bench of the Lahore High Court (LHC) admitted an appeal of PML-Q MPAs for hearing against a single bench of the LHC asking the Speaker National Assembly to administer oath taking to Chief Minister Hamza Shehbaz as some important issues were raised in the Intra Court Appeal.

The bench referred the appeal to the Chief Justice for constitution a larger bench for its disposal in accordance with the law after Eid holidays.

The applicant’s counsel raised the issue that neither the President of Pakistan and Governor of the Punjab were made as respondents in the constitutional petition, nor any notice of hearing was issued enabling them to controvert the contentions raised by respondent.

He said important legal and constitutional questions raised by counsel for appellants qua maintainability of constitutional petition had neither been noted nor repelled with reasons in impugned judgment.

He said since interpretation of various constitutional provisions was involved, notice was required to be issued to Attorney General of Pakistan and Advocate General of Punjab, but the mandatory provisions of law were not complied with and single bench passed the impugned judgment without due process guaranteed under Articles 4 and 10-A of the Constitution.

He said fresh constitutional petition was not competent and remedy, if any, was by way of filing contempt petition.

He also argued that High Court has no authority to nominate any specific person, including Speaker of the National Assembly, for administration of oath to the newly elected Chief Minister of the Punjab, thus the impugned judgment, being in violation of various provisions of the Constitution as well as applicable law, is unsustainable.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.