AIRLINK 62.48 Increased By ▲ 2.05 (3.39%)
BOP 5.36 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.19%)
CNERGY 4.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.43%)
DFML 15.50 Increased By ▲ 0.66 (4.45%)
DGKC 66.40 Increased By ▲ 1.60 (2.47%)
FCCL 17.59 Increased By ▲ 0.73 (4.33%)
FFBL 27.70 Increased By ▲ 2.95 (11.92%)
FFL 9.27 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (2.32%)
GGL 10.06 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1%)
HBL 105.70 Increased By ▲ 1.49 (1.43%)
HUBC 122.30 Increased By ▲ 4.78 (4.07%)
HUMNL 6.60 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.92%)
KEL 4.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-1.1%)
KOSM 4.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.97%)
MLCF 36.20 Increased By ▲ 0.79 (2.23%)
OGDC 122.92 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (0.43%)
PAEL 23.00 Increased By ▲ 1.09 (4.97%)
PIAA 29.34 Increased By ▲ 2.05 (7.51%)
PIBTL 5.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-2.36%)
PPL 107.50 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.12%)
PRL 27.25 Increased By ▲ 0.74 (2.79%)
PTC 18.07 Increased By ▲ 1.97 (12.24%)
SEARL 53.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.63 (-1.17%)
SNGP 63.21 Increased By ▲ 2.01 (3.28%)
SSGC 10.80 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.47%)
TELE 9.20 Increased By ▲ 0.71 (8.36%)
TPLP 11.44 Increased By ▲ 0.86 (8.13%)
TRG 70.86 Increased By ▲ 0.95 (1.36%)
UNITY 23.62 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.47%)
WTL 1.28 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BR100 6,944 Increased By 65.8 (0.96%)
BR30 22,827 Increased By 258.6 (1.15%)
KSE100 67,142 Increased By 594.3 (0.89%)
KSE30 22,090 Increased By 175.1 (0.8%)

ISLAMABAD: The Board of Investment (BoI) has said an investment of $ 3 billion by Korean companies in energy sector is in jeopardy as their under-process projects are not being treated fairly, well-informed sources told Business Recorder.

Jamil Ahmad Qureshi, Director General (Investment Promotion), in a letter to Chairman NEPRA and other concerned officials explained the case of Korean company.

According to BoI, M/s Korea South East Power Company (KOEN), (Pvt) Ltd-Pakistan is the owner and developer of 215 MW Asrit-kedam Hydropower Project and 238 MW Kalam-Asrit Hydropower Project having total investment of about $ 1.0 billion located in Swat.

The Korea Hydro and Nuclear Power Co (KHNP) is the owner and developer of 496 MW lower Spatgah Hydropower project and 350 MW Athmuqam Hydropower project with total investment of $ 2.0 billion.

KOEN and KHNP are the State-Owned Companies (SoCs) and subsidiaries of Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEPCO) who began investing in Pakistan back in 2013 and successfully delivered 102 MW Gulpur Hydropower project, which started operation in 2020.

IPPs: PPIB irked by withdrawal of tax exemptions

The company (KOEN) signed a MoU with Govt. of KPK in May-2017 for the development of 215 MW Asrit-kedam Hydropower Project and LoI for Kalam Asrit Hydropower Project was issued in Apr-2018, while the LoI for Asrit- Kedam Hydropower project was issued in June-2021.

The BoI argued that following the issuance of LoIs Korean company started development work and invested around $ 20 million to conduct feasibility studies, establishment of SPCs, offices & hiring HR. At the time, when KOEN was all set to go to NEPRA in March/Apr-2022 for tariff determination it was observed by the company that Nepra Is not processing the tariff approvals based on the premise that KOEN’S projects are not included in Indicative Generation Capacity Expansion Plan (IGCEP).

“The change in the regime has put all their investment in serious jeopardy. The company is of the view that the inclusion of projects in IGCEP was never a condition of LoI when it took investment decision. This significant change in the regime has shaken their confidence and they are worried about loss of investment and the jobs of local staff,” DG BoI added. The company has requested to declare their projects as “committed project” under IGCEP or exception be given under the power policy as they took investment decision well before the change of regime.

According to BoI, prima facie, the issues being faced by the company seem genuine and are required to be addressed by the Authorities, ie, Ministry of Energy (Power Division), Nepra and NTDC.

The Board of Investment being the apex agency of Government of Pakistan for facilitation of foreign investments proposes that all the stakeholders extend due consideration to the matter and look into the issues of the company under the rules & regulations so that the confidence of Korean investors maybe be restored without hampering bilateral investment relations.

The company’s Branch Manager Yoon, An Sang, in his letter to BoI stated that under the respective LoIs for the projects, KOEN was required to complete the feasibility studies and then approach NEPRA for feasibility stage tariff determination followed by issuance of Tripartite Letter of Support (TIOS) bv PPIB. Relying on the Security Package issued by PPIB (refer clause 3.1.4 of BoI Investment Policy 2013) projects were required to achieve financial close followed by construction start and commercial operations.

KOEN claims that it has already achieved significant progress and is all set to go to Nepra in March/ April 2022 for tariff determination, however, to company’s surprise, it understands that the regulator is not processing the tariff approvals based on the premise that its projects are not included in IGCEP.

The IGCEP recently announced by NTDC wherein number of public sector hydropower projects (about 10,000 MW) and renewable (wind & solar) projects (about 10,000 MW) have been included as “committed projects” while the private sector hydropower projects have been completely ignored.

“Unilateral change in policy and regime by the Government has put all the Korean investment of $ 3 billion in serious jeopardy as inclusion of projects in IGCEP was never the condition of LoI when KOEN took the investment decision,” said company’s Branch Manager.

The Asian Development Bank (ADB) has also shown interest in considering participating-both as a lender and as a minority shareholder in the financing of 215 MW Asrit-Kedam Hydropower Project. However, ADB is of the view that such financing would be dependent upon a number of factors including Bank’s full satisfaction with the project’s financial, economic, environmental, integrity, social, procurement, structural and documentary underpinnings as well as the receipt of all requisite internal approvals and compliance with other guidelines set by the bank.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed.

Salahuddin Rifai Feb 15, 2022 10:39am
Should the power projects be allowed, if there is no need for them in coming few years while the country already has a very big overcapacity in generation of power?
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Salahuddin Rifai Feb 15, 2022 10:41am
Should such projects be allowed on immediate basis while the country has an overcapacity of power generation and even the existing capacity payments are not payable!
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Ranjha Feb 15, 2022 11:29am
Please....we can't afford the existing power capacity why are encouraging setting up more? BOI is a one trick pony that just wants to show its "performance" by showing headline FDI numbers. Who in this country is actually responsible for long term integrated planning of production capacity, transmission, distribution and actual ability of the consumer and guarantor (i. e. GoP) to pay for the endless capacity being put up???
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Ahmad Feb 15, 2022 02:37pm
@Salahuddin Rifai sahib, NTDC proposed IGCEP recommends the capacity addition of about 25,000 MW in next 10 years based on current GDP growth and conservative assumptions. This is unfair to say that country need no new capacity addition. Out of 25,000 MW, WAPDA is going to develop 10,000 MW including Bhasha and Dasu. Are you saying that these WAPDA projects should be shelved. Normally hydropower requires a development period of 8-10 years. If we will not plan today, how can we get required capacity when needed. The only option at that time would be to add quick fix rental or thermal. This will be a disastrous for country. The investors point of view is simple that once the Government has issued licence based on certain requirements then goal post should not changed in between as this will seriously damage the prospects much needed FDI for Pakistan.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Salman Feb 16, 2022 07:01pm
Somebody in BoI should read para 11 and 12 of the respective project LoIs. Summary of these paras. All investment to be made by sponsor shall be at its own risk with no cost to GoP and LoI doesn’t mean vested right has established and hence can’t construed to be assumed as award of project.
thumb_up Recommended (0)