AIRLINK 72.18 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (0.68%)
BOP 4.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.4%)
CNERGY 4.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.91%)
DFML 28.49 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.21%)
DGKC 81.30 Decreased By ▼ -1.10 (-1.33%)
FCCL 21.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-2.05%)
FFBL 33.05 Decreased By ▼ -1.10 (-3.22%)
FFL 9.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-2.18%)
GGL 10.48 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (3.56%)
HBL 114.00 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (0.88%)
HUBC 140.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-0.36%)
HUMNL 9.03 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (12.45%)
KEL 4.73 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (7.99%)
KOSM 4.38 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-2.67%)
MLCF 37.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-0.95%)
OGDC 133.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.99 (-0.74%)
PAEL 25.60 Decreased By ▼ -1.02 (-3.83%)
PIAA 23.98 Decreased By ▼ -1.42 (-5.59%)
PIBTL 6.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.07%)
PPL 122.62 Increased By ▲ 0.67 (0.55%)
PRL 27.07 Decreased By ▼ -0.66 (-2.38%)
PTC 13.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-1.45%)
SEARL 56.62 Increased By ▲ 1.73 (3.15%)
SNGP 69.24 Decreased By ▼ -0.46 (-0.66%)
SSGC 10.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.58%)
TELE 8.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.59%)
TPLP 11.28 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (3.01%)
TRG 61.21 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (0.51%)
UNITY 25.33 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.44%)
WTL 1.50 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (17.19%)
BR100 7,630 Decreased By -8.3 (-0.11%)
BR30 24,990 Increased By 18.4 (0.07%)
KSE100 72,602 Decreased By -159.4 (-0.22%)
KSE30 23,539 Decreased By -86.6 (-0.37%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has reduced the amount of fine imposed on the Ravi Urban Development Authority (RUDA) from rupees five lac to one lac for repeatedly filing applications against stay on the Ravi Riverfront Urban Development Project and changing its counsel also.

The court in its verbal orders on August 31 had imposed rupees five lac in the presence of Chief Executive Officer of RUDA Imran Amin. However, in its written order the court dismissed the petitions as withdrawn with a cost of rupees one lac be paid to the Lahore High Court Bar dispensary.

The court also stayed the process of land acquisition for riverfront project on the petitions filed by farmers and landowners.

The court in its written order observed that various anomalies have crept in the filing of these applications. Firstly, they seek the same relief and this cannot be permitted, secondly these have been filed by a new counsel who has done so without permission of this court and without compliance of the requirements of Order III CPC, thirdly, these applications could not in the ordinary course be fixed during summer vacations and it is not known as to how they were fixed.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2021

Comments

Comments are closed.