BR100 Decreased By (-0.91%)
BR30 Decreased By (-1.47%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.78%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.75%)
AGHA 6.67 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.15%)
BECO 4.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.46%)
BML 56.17 Decreased By ▼ -1.15 (-2.01%)
BOP 30.12 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-0.76%)
CNERGY 12.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-1.07%)
CSIL 5.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.85%)
FCCL 51.65 Decreased By ▼ -1.14 (-2.16%)
FFL 14.49 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-1.56%)
FNEL 1.21 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (8.04%)
KEL 6.06 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.49%)
KOSM 5.84 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.92%)
LOTCHEM 26.17 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-1.1%)
MLCF 91.23 Decreased By ▼ -1.93 (-2.07%)
NBP 164.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.47 (-0.29%)
NCPL 53.18 Decreased By ▼ -2.48 (-4.46%)
NPL 59.12 Decreased By ▼ -2.04 (-3.34%)
OGDC 313.39 Decreased By ▼ -3.34 (-1.05%)
PACE 9.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.01%)
PAEL 35.24 Decreased By ▼ -0.39 (-1.09%)
PIBTL 14.71 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.2%)
PPL 221.36 Decreased By ▼ -5.55 (-2.45%)
PRL 91.22 Decreased By ▼ -1.80 (-1.94%)
PTC 59.19 Decreased By ▼ -1.07 (-1.78%)
SSGC 23.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.51 (-2.14%)
TBL 8.75 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TELE 7.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-2.44%)
TPL 22.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-1.43%)
TPLP 12.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.41 (-3.16%)
TREET 21.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.43 (-1.94%)
TRG 55.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.77 (-1.36%)
BR Research

GDP, inflation, and petroleum pricing

Published Updated

Nothing short of a dilemma faces this government. Petroleum price question is going to test the nerves and promises to give sleepless nights to the authorities, if oil prices projections currently being made hold true. The dilemma goes beyond the most obvious revenue question. Increase the price and pocket some tax revenue and risk facing low petroleum consumption. Don’t do that, and the elastic nature of petroleum products could inflate the import bill.

What to do? The answer will lie in what the priorities are for the remaining tenure. Like it or not, petroleum prices remain a largely political decision. What is crystal clear at this point is that the government has set two priorities going forward. Higher growth and controlled inflation. How does that fit into the petroleum pricing and demand equation is the point to ponder.

The demand elasticity of petroleum products, especially gasoline is well registered – and barring exceptions, it has largely followed the pattern for the past many years. In simpler words, raise the price, and see demand (or demand growth) coming down. Let us assume there is no subsidy at play here, and petroleum taxes continue to remain the main lever. This scenario will fetch more revenue, even at suppressed demand growth.

But it fuels inflation too, and that contradicts with government’s priority number one. Not that all of it is under government’s own control. For instance, if oil prices rise to a certain point, where even no taxes mean higher prices, then too bad. But don’t expect the government to jack up prices as long as it is inflation control is a top priority. Not that it does not have fiscal consequences. But that is precisely why it is a dilemma.

Now on to the growth aspect. When higher prices lead to lower consumption – it hampers growth. The GDP-petrol consumption has religiously followed a strong pattern over the years. Cause and effect can be left for some other day, but high petroleum growth has invariably led to higher GDP growth, and lower consumption has yielded lower GDP. There have been no exceptions to the trend in the last ten years.

So, raising prices hamper both the government’s newly set priorities – growth and inflation. Not raising them could spell fiscal trouble. Will the government go for its priorities and sustain as much as it could? Will fiscal consequences have a bigger say? Whichever way it goes, it will have lasting consequences. Here is hoping whatever decisions are taken, are well-calculated, informed, and in-line with the near-term objectives of sustainable growth and controlled inflation.

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.