BR100 Decreased By (-0.6%)
BR30 Decreased By (-1.16%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.55%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.52%)
AGHA 6.71 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.45%)
BECO 4.37 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BML 56.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.82 (-1.43%)
BOP 30.07 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-0.92%)
CNERGY 12.97 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-1.14%)
CSIL 5.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-1.11%)
FCCL 52.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.79 (-1.5%)
FFL 14.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-1.83%)
FNEL 1.11 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.89%)
KEL 6.13 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.66%)
KOSM 6.04 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (5.41%)
LOTCHEM 26.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.79%)
MLCF 91.49 Decreased By ▼ -1.67 (-1.79%)
NBP 164.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.66 (-0.4%)
NCPL 53.53 Decreased By ▼ -2.13 (-3.83%)
NPL 59.04 Decreased By ▼ -2.12 (-3.47%)
OGDC 314.50 Decreased By ▼ -2.23 (-0.7%)
PACE 9.88 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.1%)
PAEL 35.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.44 (-1.23%)
PIBTL 14.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.14%)
PPL 222.69 Decreased By ▼ -4.22 (-1.86%)
PRL 91.18 Decreased By ▼ -1.84 (-1.98%)
PTC 59.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.92 (-1.53%)
SSGC 23.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.51 (-2.14%)
TBL 8.79 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.46%)
TELE 7.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-2.05%)
TPL 22.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-1.52%)
TPLP 12.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-2.47%)
TREET 21.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.35 (-1.58%)
TRG 56.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.14%)

LAHORE: The Punjab University (PU) on Monday assured the Lahore High Court that roll number slip will be issued to petitioner a Baloch student Sadia for LLB examinations.

The court sought replies from the respondents within a week as the petitioner’s counsel wanted to proceed further.

The court was hearing a petition of Sadia Baloch who challenged a notification suspending her from the university’s rolls after declaring her a miscreant student.

Earlier, the court asked the PU counsel to seek instructions on matter today.

The university’s counsel later returned to the court and presented another notification and assured the court that the petitioner shall be issued her roll number slip. He also assured the court to hold the proceedings before a discipline committee.

The court at this asked the petitioner’s counsel if he would like to press your petition further. The petitioner’s counsel responded in affirmation urging the court that the petitioner had challenged the powers exercised by the vice chancellor and other respondents against her. He said the subsequent notification presented by the university’s counsel did not annul the original notification.

The court at this directed the PU authorities to issue roll number slip to the petitioner without further delay and sought replies from the respondents.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.