BR100 Decreased By (-0.62%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.89%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.5%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.47%)
AGHA 6.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.75%)
BECO 4.37 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.46%)
BML 55.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.97 (-1.73%)
BOP 29.97 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.5%)
CNERGY 12.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.39%)
CSIL 5.24 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.32%)
FCCL 51.07 Decreased By ▼ -0.58 (-1.12%)
FFL 14.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-1.04%)
FNEL 1.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.83%)
KEL 6.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.5%)
KOSM 5.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-5.48%)
LOTCHEM 26.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.31%)
MLCF 89.29 Decreased By ▼ -1.94 (-2.13%)
NBP 162.00 Decreased By ▼ -2.19 (-1.33%)
NCPL 52.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.78 (-1.47%)
NPL 58.10 Decreased By ▼ -1.02 (-1.73%)
OGDC 312.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.49 (-0.16%)
PACE 9.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.72%)
PAEL 34.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-0.82%)
PIBTL 14.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-2.11%)
PPL 219.00 Decreased By ▼ -2.36 (-1.07%)
PRL 91.45 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (0.25%)
PTC 58.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.40 (-0.68%)
SSGC 23.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.07%)
TBL 8.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.37%)
TELE 7.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-2.1%)
TPL 21.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.73 (-3.31%)
TPLP 12.07 Decreased By ▼ -0.49 (-3.9%)
TREET 21.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.23%)
TRG 55.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.51 (-0.91%)

LAHORE: A sessions court on Thursday dismissed a petition seeking an order for registration a FIR against social activists Marvi Sirmad, Tooba Syed and other participants of Aurat March held last month in Islamabad.

Besides merits, the court also dismissed the petition on the ground of legal and territorial jurisdiction of the sessions court to entertain it.

The court ruled that this is neither the correct forum for this petition, nor do the speech acts identified in the application constitute offences as claimed by the petitioner. The police was right to exercise caution in admitting an FIR against a constitutionally protected gathering raising slogans regarding social issues.

The court also observed that the March was a peaceful demonstration raising the issue of gender-based oppression that deserves attention.

The court said there has been no reported instance of violence or public disorder and in fact the protest took place with the permission of the city administration.

The court noted that the poster allegedly displayed at the March did not specifically name any holy personage, thus not attracting any defamation provisions.

“The fact that the petitioner took offence from a vague slogan and labelled it as blasphemy reflects his own state of mind and pattern of thought. He has alleged a very serious offence without any iota of supporting material,” the court held.

The court observed that this is an alarming trend in the society where such serious allegations are routinely levelled on the basis of subjective inferences and interpretations forcefully imposed upon speech of the citizens.

“This trend is dangerous because every speech has a potential to be twisted and given a meaning of one’s own liking or disliking,” the court added.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2021

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.