BR100 Decreased By (-0.08%)
BR30 Increased By (0.08%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.11%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.2%)
AGHA 7.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.31%)
BECO 5.11 Decreased By ▼ -0.46 (-8.26%)
BML 58.30 Decreased By ▼ -1.44 (-2.41%)
BOP 34.58 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.52%)
CNERGY 13.68 Increased By ▲ 0.57 (4.35%)
CSIL 6.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.72%)
FCCL 57.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.51 (-0.88%)
FFL 16.50 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (1.66%)
FNEL 1.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.83%)
KEL 7.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.94%)
KOSM 5.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.83%)
LOTCHEM 27.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.58%)
MLCF 101.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.82 (-0.8%)
NBP 203.29 Decreased By ▼ -1.77 (-0.86%)
NCPL 60.47 Increased By ▲ 0.84 (1.41%)
NPL 69.80 Increased By ▲ 1.24 (1.81%)
OGDC 318.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.44 (-0.14%)
PACE 11.12 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.63%)
PAEL 42.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-0.56%)
PIBTL 16.72 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.54%)
PPL 230.62 Increased By ▲ 1.17 (0.51%)
PRL 76.73 Increased By ▲ 5.93 (8.38%)
PTC 71.18 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.25%)
SSGC 27.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-1.13%)
TBL 10.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.29%)
TELE 8.56 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.35%)
TPL 23.59 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (2.3%)
TPLP 15.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-1.97%)
TREET 24.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.81%)
TRG 60.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.33%)

After decades of US caterwauling about the crippling impact of China's low labour costs on domestic manufacturing, firms state-side now fret about the impact of rising Chinese wages. First came anger, then depression and then acceptance. In the three decades since Deng Xiaoping began opening China's economy, US manufacturers have gone through something resembling Elisabeth Kuebler-Ross's five stages of grief.
Industry cried foul, then groped around for solutions, before accepting the rules of the game had changed - deciding to make a buck by offshoring some of their own production to China. To be sure, there are still frequent spasms of anger over China's ability to produce goods at "unfair" prices, notably in election years. But the bitter pain of jobs lost and factories closed has been sweetened just slightly over the years.
Using cheap Chinese labourers has resulted in $499 iPads, bumper corporate profits and - in turn - fatter pensions for those who have stock-based plans. But there are already signs that this low-cost, high-reward Chinese paradigm is coming to an end. Late Thursday, US footwear giant Nike reported it had made even more profit than it did the quarter before, yet its stock sank. Investors hacked about $1 billion off the company's value on Friday because of a reference to "declining gross margin" stashed in the bowels of the firm's quarterly report. The details are complicated, but Nike's jargon in part referred to rising wages in places like China taking a chunk out of profits. Indeed, the details show rising wages - along with some other factors like higher material costs - caused Nike's margins to fall two percent in just one year. That spells extra costs worth tens - if not hundreds - of millions of dollars.
But it is far from enough to make Nike's business unviable, so why the worry? According to Sara Hasan, an analyst who follows Nike for investment firm McAdams Wright Ragen, the concern is that wages in China are only going to increase from here on in. "It's a very big deal, and it's a longer-term issue definitely," she said. In the last year, wages in China's southern industrial belt have risen 10 percent, according to a report by Standard Chartered. They rose 11 percent the year before that.
The Shanghai authorities recently announced the minimum wage will rise 13 percent, doubtless prompted by labour shortages and worker unrest. "As (China's) economy grows and as the middle class grows, I think the pressure is going to continue," said Hasan. Nike itself admits the costs are unlikely to fall any time soon: "While some raw material costs are starting to ease, we have not seen them retreat to their previous levels; for other input costs such as labour, upward pressure continues," CEO Parker told investors.

Copyright Agence France-Presse, 2012

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.