BR100 Decreased By (-0.5%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.33%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.39%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.53%)
AGHA 7.70 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.13%)
BECO 5.38 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.32%)
BML 61.40 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.28%)
BOP 35.88 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.33%)
CNERGY 11.47 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (1.96%)
CSIL 6.13 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.65%)
FCCL 56.71 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-0.3%)
FFL 16.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.36%)
FNEL 1.20 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KEL 7.38 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.54%)
KOSM 6.07 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.33%)
LOTCHEM 27.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.18%)
MLCF 102.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.95 (-0.92%)
NBP 206.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.63 (-0.79%)
NCPL 63.90 Increased By ▲ 1.98 (3.2%)
NPL 73.10 Increased By ▲ 0.92 (1.27%)
OGDC 317.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.84 (-0.26%)
PACE 10.94 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.08%)
PAEL 44.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.16%)
PIBTL 16.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.3%)
PPL 220.65 Decreased By ▼ -1.83 (-0.82%)
PRL 64.09 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (0.44%)
PTC 73.30 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (0.19%)
SSGC 27.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.33%)
TBL 9.90 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.2%)
TELE 8.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.23%)
TPL 20.36 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.1%)
TPLP 14.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.13%)
TREET 23.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-1%)
TRG 62.04 Decreased By ▼ -0.33 (-0.53%)

The major problems, the economy of Pakistan, is facing in recent years, are the macroeconomic imbalances and sluggishness of the economy. On the one hand, the whole burden lies on the shoulders of the vulnerable class in the form of high food and non-food prices and the low level of income. On the other hand, the macroeconomic policies of the government badly ruin the lower class of society.
Recently, the economy of Pakistan is facing some serious threats in the form of high fiscal deficit, current account deficit war on terror and food shortages etc. The devastation caused by the floods has been unprecedented. It engulfed the whole nation and created a humanitarian catastrophe in the country. It has badly damaged the agriculture sector of the economy. Millions of standing crops were washed away by the flash floods. Thousands of hectares of arable land were destroyed. Millions of houses were washed away by the floods. In this situation, proper formulation and implementation of economic policies can help to cure these economic ailments. Monetary policy, in this regard, plays a pivotal role in promoting economic growth and price stability. Keeping in view the rising prices in the country, on 25th of March 2011, the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) announced a monetary policy by keeping constant its benchmark interest rate at 14 percent with the aim of curbing high inflation prevailing in the economy. Since 2005, SBP has used interest rate as a main weapon in the formulation of monetary policy.
The announcement of such a strict policy may lead to serious economic conditions and may have some serious macroeconomic implication for the economy of Pakistan that has a very low growth potential. The growth momentum of the economy is also very sluggish. The policymakers should accept one thing that the sources of inflation in Pakistan are non-monetary rather than monetary. Inflation in Pakistan is largely affected by the expectations and supply-side factors. High fiscal deficit and rise in non-performing loans (NPLs) are the important sources of inflation in recent years. The catastrophic floods have further heightened the inflationary pressure in the country. Furthermore, the reformed GST would play a critical role in increasing prices in the country.
The problem of unemployment has worsened. Damocles' sword of hunger, starvation and deprivation is hanging over the head of the masses. Millions of people are homeless, jobless and even deprived of the basic necessities of life, aggregate demand and output growths are very sluggish. The economy is in dire need of a big push in the form of high investment. However, the increase in interest rate by policymakers will lead to crowding out of private investment. Moreover, high interest rates will further worsen the situation of the fiscal deficit because of high interest payment by the government in the wake of high borrowing from the private sector. On the one side, the SBP is trying to aggravate the liquidity crunch in order to stabilise the prices. On the other side, the circulation of money is expected to increase because of increased borrowing by the government to finance its high expenditures. The next problem the country will face after the announcement of the monetary policy, is the unattended inflation in the wake of high external loans and the surge in international oil prices after the conflict in Libya and other central Asia countries.
Data and empirical studies regarding the interest rate, output growth, fiscal deficit and inflation show that the policy rate has a very low contact with inflation in Pakistan. Since 2005 and onwards, there seems to be a positive correlation between the policy rate and the general price level. Moreover, there is also a positive relationship between interest rates and the fiscal deficit. It is due to the fact that high interest rates increases interest payment on government debt that leads to even higher budget deficit. Further, an increase in government spending that results from higher interest rates creates a competition for loans between public and private sectors that in turn crowds out private sector investment and consumption. Debt overhanging is one of the most critical problems faced by Pakistan that is primarily due to higher budget deficits. Recent monetary policies would further worsen the situation. Unless fiscal deficits are not controlled, it would result in mounting government debt. Empirical studies show a negative relationship between high interest rate and real GDP growth rate. Further, high fiscal deficit negatively affects economic growth.
In such a state of affairs, when the growth process of the economy is inundated, the burden lies on the shoulders of the government to keep its budget deficit under control. Otherwise, the country may bear the cost of high inflation and low output growth. However, the cutback in fiscal deficit must be due to a reduction in the policy rate by the SBP that in turn, would lessen the interest payment of the government and hence, private investment and GDP growth rates will increase.
(The writers are respectively Lecturer in Economics at University of Swat, Assistant Professor at University of Swat and Student of M. Sc Economics at GPG Jahanzeb College Saidu Sharif Swat)

Copyright Business Recorder, 2011

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.