BR100 Decreased By (-0.23%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.01%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.19%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.24%)
AGHA 7.75 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.78%)
BECO 5.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.19%)
BML 59.50 Decreased By ▼ -1.73 (-2.83%)
BOP 36.54 Increased By ▲ 0.54 (1.5%)
CNERGY 12.19 Increased By ▲ 0.94 (8.36%)
CSIL 6.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.16%)
FCCL 57.41 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (0.93%)
FFL 16.57 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.36%)
FNEL 1.20 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KEL 7.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.08%)
KOSM 6.06 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.17%)
LOTCHEM 27.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.18%)
MLCF 102.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.89 (-0.86%)
NBP 206.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.93 (-0.45%)
NCPL 62.36 Increased By ▲ 0.44 (0.71%)
NPL 71.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.38 (-0.53%)
OGDC 319.00 Increased By ▲ 0.51 (0.16%)
PACE 11.33 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (2.44%)
PAEL 43.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.54 (-1.22%)
PIBTL 16.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.24%)
PPL 221.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.98 (-0.44%)
PRL 63.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.09%)
PTC 72.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.16 (-1.59%)
SSGC 27.33 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.29%)
TBL 9.88 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TELE 8.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.68%)
TPL 20.70 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (1.77%)
TPLP 15.04 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.47%)
TREET 24.12 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.08%)
TRG 63.25 Increased By ▲ 0.88 (1.41%)

Responding to a question during an interview with a foreign news agency about a series of unsubstantiated news reports published by New York Times, DG ISPR and Military Spokesman Major General Athar Abbas rejected the allegations levelled against the Army and ISI, and described them as baseless and mischievous.
Major General Athar Abbas said in recent weeks the New York Times has continued to publish wild claims presented as news stories on the basis on information supposedly provided by unnamed US officials. He said in most cases such news reports have quoted anonymous US sources, bringing the veracity of their reporting into question.
Recalling NYT's apology of March 2004 about some of its coverage of the Iraq war, General Abbas said at that time the newspaper had this to say: 'In some cases, information that was controversial then, and seems questionable now, was insufficiently qualified or allowed to stand unchallenged.
Looking back, we wish we had been more aggressive in re-examining the claims as new evidence emerged-or failed to emerge'. The Military Spokesman further said: "if the newspaper continues with its vilifying campaign without any concrete evidence, I am afraid at some point it may end up expressing its deep regret the way it did in the case of its Iraq coverage.-PR

Copyright Business Recorder, 2011

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.