BR100 Increased By (0.24%)
BR30 Increased By (0.54%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.29%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.17%)
AGHA 7.64 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.13%)
BECO 5.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.42 (-7.54%)
BML 59.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-0.4%)
BOP 34.64 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (0.7%)
CNERGY 13.12 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.08%)
CSIL 6.50 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.4%)
FCCL 57.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-0.45%)
FFL 16.27 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.25%)
FNEL 1.21 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KEL 7.45 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.27%)
KOSM 6.09 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (1%)
LOTCHEM 27.70 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.11%)
MLCF 102.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.05%)
NBP 205.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.03%)
NCPL 61.30 Increased By ▲ 1.67 (2.8%)
NPL 70.09 Increased By ▲ 1.53 (2.23%)
OGDC 320.43 Increased By ▲ 1.51 (0.47%)
PACE 11.26 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (1.9%)
PAEL 42.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.26%)
PIBTL 16.63 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PPL 232.60 Increased By ▲ 3.15 (1.37%)
PRL 74.92 Increased By ▲ 4.12 (5.82%)
PTC 71.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SSGC 27.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.4%)
TBL 10.27 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.39%)
TELE 8.56 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.35%)
TPL 23.18 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.52%)
TPLP 15.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.82%)
TREET 24.72 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.04%)
TRG 60.08 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.35%)

JCR-VIS Credit Rating Company Limited has reaffirmed the Management Quality Rating of Al-Meezan Investment Management Limited (AMIM) at 'AM2' (AM-Two). Outlook on the rating is 'Stable'. AMIM has eight funds under management, including two closed end schemes with cumulative AuMs of rupees 26 billion at December end 2010, largest amongst private sector AMCs.
The investor base is strong with over 15,000 investors at June end 2010 in the open-end funds under management. Unit holding pattern features relatively low concentration vis-à-vis peers, with 43 percent of net assets of open-end funds contributed by retail investors. There is nevertheless room for further improvement.
Funds managed by AMIM having equity exposures have posted competitive returns vis-à-vis peers, though both Meezan Islamic Fund and Al-Meezan Mutual Fund have under-performed benchmark on account of being under-weight in two large index constituents, in recent periods.
The performance and risk profile of Meezan Sovereign Fund and Meezan Cash Fund is also sound. Meezan Islamic Income Fund has experienced some delinquencies, affecting the risk profile of the fund. The selection and monitoring of fixed income instruments may be streamlined further. For income funds under management, benchmarks may need to be adjusted to make comparison more meaningful.-PR

Copyright Business Recorder, 2011

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.