BR100 Increased By (0.17%)
BR30 Increased By (0.34%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.25%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.2%)
AGHA 7.46 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.93%)
BECO 5.14 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.59%)
BML 60.52 Increased By ▲ 2.22 (3.81%)
BOP 34.60 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.06%)
CNERGY 13.98 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (2.19%)
CSIL 6.34 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.63%)
FCCL 57.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-0.33%)
FFL 16.26 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-1.45%)
FNEL 1.20 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KEL 7.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.54%)
KOSM 6.01 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.5%)
LOTCHEM 27.63 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.44%)
MLCF 101.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.12%)
NBP 203.49 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.1%)
NCPL 60.48 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.02%)
NPL 69.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.29%)
OGDC 318.55 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.02%)
PACE 11.08 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.36%)
PAEL 42.90 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.09%)
PIBTL 16.76 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.24%)
PPL 231.50 Increased By ▲ 0.88 (0.38%)
PRL 82.70 Increased By ▲ 5.97 (7.78%)
PTC 71.55 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (0.52%)
SSGC 27.15 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.18%)
TBL 10.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-1.26%)
TELE 8.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.12%)
TPL 23.49 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.42%)
TPLP 15.65 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (1.29%)
TREET 24.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.04%)
TRG 59.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.41 (-0.68%)

A three-member bench of the Supreme Court here on Wednesday restored two assistant professors (APs) of Centre for High Energy Physics (CHEP), University of the Punjab, who were removed from services on alleged plagiarism. The bench headed by Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry held that the APs were removed by the Governor, who was not a competent authority.
Allowing their appeals against their removal orders, the court held that as the university did not adopt legal course of proceedings against them, the university authorities were at liberty to hold departmental proceedings against them purely according to the law.
Appellants Maqsood Ahmed and Alam Saeed had submitted that the university authorities did not adopt legal course in removing them. Their counsel submitted that the vice chancellor sought assistance from syndicate committee, which recommended seizure of two increments each.
They further said that the syndicate did not find them plagiarism, holding that they were not set pattern in this regard to evaluate the plagiarists. They said but the chancellor went beyond the limits and instead of seizing their increments, removed them from services.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2010

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.