BR100 Decreased By (-1.19%)
BR30 Decreased By (-1.67%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-1.01%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.98%)
BECO 5.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.71%)
BML 58.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.77 (-1.29%)
BOP 35.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.40 (-1.11%)
CNERGY 8.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-1.78%)
DCL 11.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.67%)
FCCL 57.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.79 (-1.36%)
FCSC 5.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-3.25%)
FFL 18.23 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.76%)
FNEL 1.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.52%)
HUMNL 11.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-1.83%)
KEL 8.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-2.25%)
KOSM 7.00 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.29%)
MLCF 101.25 Decreased By ▼ -1.22 (-1.19%)
NBP 204.74 Decreased By ▼ -2.73 (-1.32%)
PACE 11.27 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-2.59%)
PAEL 43.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.63 (-1.44%)
PIAHCLA 26.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.42 (-1.55%)
PIBTL 17.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-1.26%)
PPL 245.80 Decreased By ▼ -3.26 (-1.31%)
PRL 36.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.59 (-1.61%)
PTC 66.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.02 (-1.52%)
SEARL 95.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.52 (-0.54%)
SSGC 31.62 Increased By ▲ 0.99 (3.23%)
TELE 9.04 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-3%)
THCCL 68.04 Decreased By ▼ -1.21 (-1.75%)
TPLP 10.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.54 (-4.89%)
TREET 26.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.55 (-2.07%)
TRG 69.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.49 (-0.7%)
WAVES 11.35 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.71%)
WTL 1.31 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
Print Print edition: 2006-02-07

Energy efficiency

Published February 7, 2006 Updated February 7, 2006 12:00am

The letter from Sui Southern Gas Co under the above caption (B/R, 28/1/06) is indeed wonderful news for all energy professionals since the gas company has come out solidly in favour of conserving natural gas.
SSGC's confirmation that the approval for new gas connection is only given to those industrial (and commercial) users opting for integrated cogeneration should really help remove the present trend to somehow get gas sanctioned, and then worry about efficiency.
Efforts should be made to educate the industrialists, since conservation of our precious gas resources must be understood at all levels. We just do not have the gas to waste and the earlier this fact sinks in, the better for the country's economy.
Another trend to watch out for, is to "mis-declare" the cogeneration system design to get an approval of a gas sanction and then continue with the inefficient operation. Gas companies instal two gas meters, one for power generation and the other for industrial consumption like steam, hot water, etc. It should be easily possible to confirm cogeneration operation efficiency if the second gas meter has very low consumption.
Normally, in most industries, the gas meters for steam/hot water boilers have make up a major part of consumption, which really shows how poor the cogeneration efficiency is. We can certainly do without such wasteful cogeneration power plants in which the major gas continues to be consumed in boilers.
Since SSGC is following the latest ECC's directive, it is worth checking how a large Government Complex has been allowed major gas use for most inefficient power generation when this building had been originally sanctioned gas, specifically for cogeneration.
Also, a new bank building has been sanctioned gas for most inefficient power generation. Is the new gas policy really working? At the end, it is heartening to note that the SSGC is fully committed to a "greener" Pakistan but shouldn't the good role start first at "home"?
The SSGC Head Office Building is perhaps the worst example of how "energy inefficient" a building can be! It would be in the interest of efficiency, if the SSGC worked towards the "greening" of their own building first.
It is also hoped that the SNGPL, like the SSGC would also openly confirm the enforcement of gas conservation policies as per ECC's directive.
If both the SSGC and SNGPL follow the correct gas management policy, considerable gas will be saved when the effect of this policy starts bringing results in the next few years. In the short term, it is unfortunate that hundreds of millions of dollars, invested in-inefficient power generation technologies, have taken us "backwards" as we will continue to waste enormous gas till these systems are changed! But at least, a beginning can be, and must be made now, so that no further wastage of precious gas is allowed.
Conservation, whether of energy resources or water or our life style, is the only answer.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2006

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.