BR100 Decreased By (-0.08%)
BR30 Increased By (0.08%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.11%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.2%)
AGHA 7.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.31%)
BECO 5.11 Decreased By ▼ -0.46 (-8.26%)
BML 58.30 Decreased By ▼ -1.44 (-2.41%)
BOP 34.58 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.52%)
CNERGY 13.68 Increased By ▲ 0.57 (4.35%)
CSIL 6.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.72%)
FCCL 57.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.51 (-0.88%)
FFL 16.50 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (1.66%)
FNEL 1.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.83%)
KEL 7.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.94%)
KOSM 5.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.83%)
LOTCHEM 27.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.58%)
MLCF 101.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.82 (-0.8%)
NBP 203.29 Decreased By ▼ -1.77 (-0.86%)
NCPL 60.47 Increased By ▲ 0.84 (1.41%)
NPL 69.80 Increased By ▲ 1.24 (1.81%)
OGDC 318.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.44 (-0.14%)
PACE 11.12 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.63%)
PAEL 42.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-0.56%)
PIBTL 16.72 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.54%)
PPL 230.62 Increased By ▲ 1.17 (0.51%)
PRL 76.73 Increased By ▲ 5.93 (8.38%)
PTC 71.18 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.25%)
SSGC 27.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-1.13%)
TBL 10.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.29%)
TELE 8.56 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.35%)
TPL 23.59 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (2.3%)
TPLP 15.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-1.97%)
TREET 24.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.81%)
TRG 60.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.33%)
BR Research

Regional trade: Consumer gains galore

Published Updated

Bilateral trade among South Asian countries has remained a dicey proposition. Developing economies of the world have galloped in terms of economic growth by forming regional trade blocs.
But South Asia remains one of the least integrated regions in the world where the share of intra-regional trade in total trade in the region has only marginally improved from 2.5 percent to 4.8 percent during 1995 to 2010.
The fear of the impact of imports is a major concern among the countries of this region. Due to the apprehensions of domestic industry, these countries have put large numbers of products on their respective sensitive lists.
But if trade in the region is liberalised, consumers will win big, asserts a research report issued recently by a consortium of think tanks including the Asia Foundation, SDPI and CUTS, among others.
The "cost of economic non-cooperation to consumers in South Asia" report also asserts that consumers in Pakistan would be particularly benefited by liberalising trade with India. The countrys consumers can count on savings of about 206.18 million dollars each year, if 44 items currently on the countrys sensitive list are allowed to be imported freely from within the region.
The magnitude of the savings for domestic consumers is significant; tallying at about 60 percent of the total value of imports of these product lines to the country. A whopping 99 percent of this gain can be achieved by allowing free import from India, of six product lines that are currently on the sensitive list.
Pakistani consumers of pharmaceuticals, electrical and electronics equipment would be benefited most, deriving 84 percent and 13.8 percent of the consumer gains, respectively.
Domestic industries such as pharmaceuticals are able to sway the Pakistani government, just as the domestic industries of other countries in the region affect the international trade preferences of other countries in the region.
But this influence of protectionism is coming at the expense of the consumers who are missing out on potential gains in the form of cheaper and better quality of products and services. The countries of the region must reassess their economic priorities to be more mindful of the interests of domestic consumers.

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.