Pakistan’s cyclical economy and burden of unfinished reforms

Every few years, Pakistan seems to move into another financial crisis. Inflation, IMF programmes, rising fuel and electricity prices, unemployment, and the weakening rupee have become permanent features of daily life.

Even when the economy shows signs of improvement on paper, ordinary citizens cannot feel meaningful relief in their household budgets. Instead, survival has gradually become more difficult for many families, especially in urban middle-class and lower-income households.

Pakistan’s economic challenges are not recent. They are rooted in decades of structural weaknesses, including weak governance, inconsistent policies, narrow tax collection, low exports, and heavy dependence on external borrowing. Successive governments have promised stability and reform, yet economic cycles have remained broadly the same, with short periods of improvement followed by renewed pressure.

In 1947, Pakistan inherited an extremely fragile economy. The industrial base was almost non-existent, financial institutions were weak, and agriculture formed the backbone of the economy.

Also read: Pakistan inflation returns to double digits at 10.9% in April 2026

Today, even after several decades, this structural imbalance is still visible. In 2000, Pakistan’s gross domestic product (GDP) was around $100 billion. By 2025, it grew to around $340 to $380 billion, showing clear expansion in size but not in stability or resilience. Similarly, per capita income, which was below $600 in the early 2000s, has risen to around $1,500 to $1,700 today, but this improvement has been uneven and eroded by inflation and rupee depreciation.

During the 1950s and 1960s, Pakistan experienced relatively strong industrial growth. However, when we compare long-term performance, the inconsistency becomes clearer. In the early 2000s, inflation was mostly in single digits, often between 3% to 8%. By contrast, in recent years it has fluctuated dramatically, reaching nearly 40% in 2023 before easing to around 4 to 7% in 2025-26. This sharp volatility shows how price stability has weakened over time rather than improved consistently.

The key issue is not whether Pakistan can grow, but whether that growth can become stable, inclusive, and sustained.

In the early decades, public debt was relatively low. In the early 2000s, Pakistan’s public debt stood around 60% of GDP. Today, it has increased to around 70-75% of GDP, despite multiple International Monetary Fund (IMF) programmes and repeated fiscal adjustments.

This indicates that borrowing has not translated into sustainable reduction of debt pressure. Instead, debt servicing has become one of the largest expenses in the federal budget, limiting development spending.

Also read: Govt debt crosses Rs80trn mark by March-end

One of the long-term comparisons is in the external account. In the early 2000s, exports were around $10-12 billion. Today, they stand at around $30-32 billion. While this shows growth, imports have increased much faster, rising from around $15-20 billion in the early 2000s to around $55-60 billion today. This widening gap has kept the trade deficit structurally high, forcing repeated borrowing cycles.

After 1971, Pakistan adopted nationalisation policies, which affected long-term private sector confidence. In later decades, especially the 1990s, economic instability increased further. During that period, inflation often remained in double digits, unemployment rose, and public debt expanded. By the late 1990s, following nuclear tests in 1998, external pressure increased significantly, and the country became more dependent on IMF support.

In the early 2000s, Pakistan entered a phase of relative economic stability. GDP growth improved, averaging around 4-6% for several years. Foreign investment increased, and sectors like banking and telecom expanded rapidly. Mobile phone penetration, which was extremely low in 2000, grew to millions of users within a decade, marking one of the most visible structural changes in the economy. However, this growth was strongly supported by external inflows and favourable global conditions rather than deep domestic reform.

By comparison, in the last decade, growth has been more unstable. Between 2015 and 2025, GDP growth has fluctuated between contraction and expansion, ranging from negative growth in crisis years to around 5-6% in recovery phases. In 2025-26, growth has stabilised at around 3-4%, still below the level needed to absorb population growth and create sufficient employment.

Similarly, energy shortages became one of the most damaging structural problems after 2007-08. At that time, electricity shortages and loadshedding reduced industrial output significantly. Today, while power generation capacity has improved, the sector still suffers from the energy circular debt, which has crossed several trillion rupees. This continues to place pressure on public finances and electricity pricing.

Tax collection has also shown only gradual improvement. In the early 2000s, Pakistan’s tax-to-GDP ratio was around 10-11%. In recent years, it has improved slightly to around 12-13%, and in some estimates near 15%. However, compared with the regional economies, it remains low. This limited tax base has forced continued reliance on borrowing, both domestic and external.

The most dramatic changes can be seen in currency and inflation. In 2000, the exchange rate was around Rs50-60 per dollar. By 2015, it had crossed Rs100, and by 2025, it reached approximately Rs280-300 per dollar. This long-term depreciation has significantly reduced the purchasing power and increased the cost of imports, fuel, and machinery.

Inflation trends show a similar pattern. In the early 2000s, inflation was generally stable at single-digit levels. Over the past few years, it has become highly volatile, reaching extreme peaks and then falling back, creating uncertainty for both businesses and households.

The crisis after 2022 marked one of the most difficult periods in recent history. Inflation surged above 30%, forex reserves fell sharply, and the rupee depreciated rapidly. Foreign exchange reserves, which were above $15 billion in earlier stable periods, dropped to critically low levels before recovering slightly to around $12-15 billion in 2025-26. At that time, Pakistan came close to a balance of payments crisis and relied heavily on IMF support and bilateral assistance to avoid default.

Unemployment trends also show long-term pressure. In the early 2000s, unemployment was estimated at around 5-6%. Today, it is officially standing around 6-8%, but youth unemployment and underemployment are significantly higher. This has contributed to rising migration, as many skilled workers seek opportunities abroad.

Despite these challenges, Pakistan still has strong potential. The population has grown from around 140 million in the early 2000s to over 240 million today, creating both a large labour force and a major consumption market. The digital economy, including IT exports and freelance services, has also expanded from negligible levels in 2000 to several billion dollars annually today, showing emerging new strengths.

However, the broader picture remains one of repeated cycles rather than stable progress. Growth has increased in size but not in consistency. Inflation has become more volatile, debt has increased as a share of the economy, and external dependency remains strong. Even though GDP is now more than three times larger than it was in 2000, the average citizen often does not feel a proportional improvement in living standards due to inflation, rupee depreciation, and uneven distribution of gains.

Pakistan’s economic history, therefore, shows a clear pattern over the last 20 to 25 years. Each decade brings some improvement in scale but also deeper structural stress. Without consistent reforms, broader tax collection, export diversification, and institutional stability, this cycle is likely to continue.

The key issue is not whether Pakistan can grow, but whether that growth can become stable, inclusive, and sustained. The numbers over the past 25 years show expansion, but they also show fragility. Until that contradiction is resolved, economic uncertainty is likely to remain a defining feature of life for ordinary citizens.

The article does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Business Recorder or its owners.