BR100 Decreased By (-0.79%)
BR30 Decreased By (-1.39%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.77%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.77%)
AGHA 7.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.18%)
BECO 5.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.58%)
BML 57.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.82 (-1.4%)
BOP 33.38 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-1.68%)
CNERGY 10.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.91%)
CSIL 5.58 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.27%)
FCCL 54.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.95 (-1.7%)
FFL 16.12 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.56%)
FNEL 1.21 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KEL 7.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.22%)
KOSM 6.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.66%)
LOTCHEM 27.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-1.62%)
MLCF 95.55 Decreased By ▼ -1.36 (-1.4%)
NBP 202.75 Decreased By ▼ -4.71 (-2.27%)
NCPL 56.13 Decreased By ▼ -0.83 (-1.46%)
NPL 65.95 Decreased By ▼ -1.35 (-2.01%)
OGDC 317.40 Decreased By ▼ -3.60 (-1.12%)
PACE 10.41 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-1.33%)
PAEL 42.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.44 (-1.02%)
PIBTL 16.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.33 (-1.97%)
PPL 218.99 Decreased By ▼ -3.85 (-1.73%)
PRL 57.65 Decreased By ▼ -1.50 (-2.54%)
PTC 70.61 Increased By ▲ 0.61 (0.87%)
SSGC 25.69 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-1.04%)
TBL 9.75 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.31%)
TELE 8.37 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-2.22%)
TPL 19.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-1.61%)
TPLP 12.84 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.63%)
TREET 23.33 Increased By ▲ 0.51 (2.23%)
TRG 60.64 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (0.41%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court on Wednesday turned down a request to suspend the impugned notifications about agricultural tax and sought replies from the respondents within fortnight.

The petitioners MPA Ijaz Shafi and Judicial Activism Panel (JAP) challenged the increase in agricultural tax in the province.

Earlier, the petitioner’s counsel argued that the government unlawfully revised agricultural income tax rates without mandatory legislative approval and by bypassing the constitutional role of the assembly. He also alleged that the impugned notifications violated Articles 4, 9, 19-A, 25, 38, 77 and 127 of the Constitution. He asserted that the taxation cannot be imposed or altered through executive action without legislative sanction and constitutional oversight. He also pleaded that the agricultural community had been subjected to discriminatory and unconstitutional taxation measures.

He also claimed that the tax in question adversely affecting farmers’ livelihoods and economic stability.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2026

Comments

200 characters remaining