BR100 Decreased By (-0.15%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.74%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.41%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.67%)
BECO 5.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-3.81%)
BML 58.03 Increased By ▲ 5.28 (10.01%)
BOP 33.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.40 (-1.17%)
CNERGY 8.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.12%)
DCL 11.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-4.62%)
FCCL 53.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.54 (-1%)
FCSC 5.40 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (3.45%)
FFL 17.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.78%)
FNEL 1.31 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.77%)
HUMNL 11.06 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.55%)
KEL 8.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.74%)
KOSM 5.45 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.3%)
MLCF 87.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.86 (-0.98%)
NBP 184.60 Decreased By ▼ -1.88 (-1.01%)
PACE 11.62 Increased By ▲ 0.90 (8.4%)
PAEL 40.31 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (0.93%)
PIAHCLA 26.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.27%)
PIBTL 17.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-1.33%)
PPL 228.40 Decreased By ▼ -4.38 (-1.88%)
PRL 34.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-1.03%)
PTC 67.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.31%)
SEARL 91.00 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.08%)
SSGC 26.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-0.99%)
TELE 8.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.47%)
THCCL 66.14 Increased By ▲ 6.01 (10%)
TPLP 9.29 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (6.05%)
TREET 24.59 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.2%)
TRG 71.69 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.08%)
WAVES 10.98 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (10.02%)
WTL 1.28 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.59%)

ISLAMABAD: In a clear violation of Islamabad High Court’s directives, the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has reportedly denied taxpayers access to order sheets entries related to their tax assessment proceedings, declaring such official records inaccessible to the aggrieved taxpayers.

When contacted, tax lawyer Waheed Shahzad Butt described the move as “a direct violation of the binding judgments of the superior/higher judiciary,” citing landmark cases including Mukhtar Ahmad Ali vs. The Registrar, Supreme Court (2023 SCP 312), Waheed Shahzad Butt vs. Federation of Pakistan (PLD 2016 Lah 872), and Sprint Oil vs. Federal Tax Ombudsman through its Registrar (P-3346/2024).

The denial of access to order/minute sheets not only violates judicial pronouncements but also contradicts the FBR’s own administrative instructions issued decades ago in Circular-Letter No. 3(9)IT-IV/78 dated 28 March 1978 and Circular No. 15 of 1958 dated 8 October 1958, which explicitly recognize the right of taxpayers to inspect and obtain copies of such records but law is closed shop at FBR: Waheed added.

Super tax case: FBR counsel urges SC to set aside IHC ‘overreach’

By ignoring these legal and administrative mandates, the FBR field formations are acting with malice in law, creating an artificial façade of performance merely to impress the Prime Minister.

Legal experts view this development as a serious challenge to judicial supremacy and taxpayers’ constitutional right to information under Article 19A of the Constitution. The issue is likely to draw the attention of oversight bodies and judicial forums in the coming days.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.