BR100 Decreased By (-1%)
BR30 Decreased By (-1.53%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.88%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.93%)
BECO 5.67 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-2.74%)
BML 59.04 Increased By ▲ 1.14 (1.97%)
BOP 33.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.49 (-1.45%)
CNERGY 8.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.61%)
DCL 11.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.44 (-3.73%)
FCCL 52.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.79 (-1.48%)
FCSC 5.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-2.22%)
FFL 17.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-1.07%)
FNEL 1.30 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
HUMNL 10.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.44%)
KEL 7.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.5%)
KOSM 5.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.83%)
MLCF 85.40 Decreased By ▼ -2.00 (-2.29%)
NBP 181.70 Decreased By ▼ -2.54 (-1.38%)
PACE 11.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.77%)
PAEL 39.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.65 (-1.61%)
PIAHCLA 25.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.51 (-1.95%)
PIBTL 16.91 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-1.34%)
PPL 224.99 Decreased By ▼ -3.74 (-1.64%)
PRL 34.17 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-0.93%)
PTC 66.02 Decreased By ▼ -1.52 (-2.25%)
SEARL 89.40 Decreased By ▼ -1.53 (-1.68%)
SSGC 26.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-1.08%)
TELE 8.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.29%)
THCCL 66.62 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (0.73%)
TPLP 9.70 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (3.97%)
TREET 24.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-1.47%)
TRG 69.90 Decreased By ▼ -1.71 (-2.39%)
WAVES 10.92 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.55%)
WTL 1.27 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.78%)

This is apropos two letters to the Editor titled above carried by the newspaper on Tuesday and yesterday. This extension is not purely theoretical.

China is already involved in several proxy confrontations—with the United States over Taiwan and trade, with the Philippines over the South China Sea, and now, possibly, with India over Pakistan. It’s no surprise, then, that Gao warned of the catastrophic consequences of escalation:

“The deterioration of the situation between India and Pakistan is a reason for great concern. These are two big countries, both armed with nuclear weapons… the consequence will be too much for either India or Pakistan to bear.”

He warned against viewing such a crisis through a limited lens:

“This is the time for both India and Pakistan, and all other stakeholders, to work very closely to get to the bottom of the situation, rather than allowing this attack to be the trigger.”

Perhaps the most alarming yet underappreciated part of Gao’s message came in his remarks about the weaponization of water — a real threat in a region reliant on the Indus basin. India has previously threatened to cut or reduce Pakistan’s water access under the Indus Waters Treaty.

Professor Gao minced no words:

“In the context of war, any stopping of a dam or the flow of the water causing drought or loss of life in another country may be considered a war crime. In a non-war context, any such action may be considered a crime against humanity.”

This was more than a caution. It was a legal and diplomatic shield, warning that Chinese diplomatic and possibly legal mechanisms would be employed to protect Pakistan from such strategic sabotage.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Qamar Bashir

The writer is a former Press Secretary to the President, An ex-Press Minister at Embassy of Pakistan to France, a former MD, SRBC Macomb, Detroit, Michigan

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.