BR100 Increased By (1.02%)
BR30 Increased By (1.71%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.58%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.65%)
BECO 6.03 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (4.51%)
BML 52.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.39 (-0.74%)
BOP 34.23 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (0.71%)
CNERGY 8.16 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.62%)
DCL 12.23 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.25%)
FCCL 53.80 Increased By ▲ 0.97 (1.84%)
FCSC 5.24 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (3.35%)
FFL 18.03 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.45%)
FNEL 1.30 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.78%)
HUMNL 11.00 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.1%)
KEL 8.07 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.62%)
KOSM 5.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-2.36%)
MLCF 87.90 Increased By ▲ 1.39 (1.61%)
NBP 186.60 Increased By ▲ 1.44 (0.78%)
PACE 10.75 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (1.61%)
PAEL 39.95 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (1.34%)
PIAHCLA 26.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.11%)
PIBTL 17.32 Increased By ▲ 0.65 (3.9%)
PPL 233.49 Increased By ▲ 5.31 (2.33%)
PRL 34.98 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (0.87%)
PTC 67.71 Increased By ▲ 2.38 (3.64%)
SEARL 90.90 Increased By ▲ 0.77 (0.85%)
SSGC 27.20 Increased By ▲ 0.60 (2.26%)
TELE 8.57 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (3.5%)
THCCL 60.85 Increased By ▲ 2.35 (4.02%)
TPLP 8.78 Increased By ▲ 0.56 (6.81%)
TREET 24.65 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.49%)
TRG 71.50 Increased By ▲ 1.79 (2.57%)
WAVES 10.01 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.7%)
WTL 1.27 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.78%)

LAHORE: Banks cannot auction joint Khata properties without demarcation of land. A higher appellate forum has set aside an order of the lower appellate forum, which allowed the auction of a petrol pump property without demarcating the land.

The forum ruled in favour of the property owner who claimed that the petrol pump was situated on their share of the joint Khata property.

Initially, the preliminary appellate forum had allowed the auction without verifying the ownership of the land. The owners, who were not parties to the original case, objected to the auction and the higher appellate forum remanded the case for a fresh decision.

According to details, the joint Khata holder, being third party, objected to the auction of mortgaged property on the pretext that they were lawful owners in possession of the land.

He developed and established a petrol pump on the aforementioned land and obtained dealership of an oil distribution company and was running their business without any interference.

He further informed the appellate forum that both he and his shareholder invested huge amount for the construction and installation of petrol pump.

Due to shortage of funds, they obtained finance facility regarding his share in the aforesaid property and executed collateral mortgaged deed in favour of a bank registered in office of Sub-Registrar and the charge of mortgage still existed in favour of the bank.

It came into his knowledge that the petrol pump was auctioned by the order of the court. He was of the view that neither he had mortgaged the property nor any loan facility was availed by him. The property in question was allegedly auctioned through a bogus auction without the court auctioneer.

He maintained he got arranged demarcation of their property by making a request to the revenue authorities and it was clear that the debtor had no concern with the property, therefore, the auction report was based on fraud which was liable to set aside.

The appellate forum maintained that the preliminary appellate forum should have verified property ownership before allowing auctions and ordered for demarcation of joint Khata properties to avoid disputes.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.