BR100 Increased By (0.01%)
BR30 Increased By (0.53%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.28%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.29%)
AGHA 6.38 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.95%)
BECO 4.35 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.87%)
BML 62.55 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.16%)
BOP 31.39 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.51%)
CNERGY 11.73 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.21%)
CSIL 5.91 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (3.32%)
FCCL 61.71 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.28%)
FFL 14.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-1.53%)
FNEL 1.24 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.81%)
KEL 6.32 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.96%)
KOSM 5.90 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (6.12%)
LOTCHEM 24.69 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.04%)
MLCF 103.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.14%)
NBP 173.32 Decreased By ▼ -1.96 (-1.12%)
NCPL 51.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.94 (-1.78%)
NPL 54.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.17%)
OGDC 315.87 Increased By ▲ 2.48 (0.79%)
PACE 9.26 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.65%)
PAEL 35.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-0.61%)
PIBTL 13.66 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.41%)
PPL 226.07 Increased By ▲ 4.26 (1.92%)
PRL 80.28 Increased By ▲ 1.20 (1.52%)
PTC 46.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.45%)
SSGC 23.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.21%)
TBL 9.24 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.75%)
TELE 7.55 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (2.17%)
TPL 24.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-2.27%)
TPLP 12.99 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (3.84%)
TREET 25.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-1.03%)
TRG 53.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.21%)

This is apropos two back-to-back letters by this writer to Editor titled ‘Overcapacity dilemma: mismanagement or misjudgment?’ carried by the newspaper yesterday and Wednesday. Having said all this in my two previous letters to the Editor, a billion-dollar question remained unanswered: Why did Pakistan’s policy makers choose to install IPPs with double the capacity needed, while developed countries like the USA, Germany, and China maintain only a 20% reserve capacity.

This decision appears to stem from a short-sighted vision, plagued by sluggish and inefficient decision-making processes. Furthermore, inherent dishonesty and vested interests have often placed personal gains over national interests, leading to decisions that prioritize immediate benefits rather than long-term sustainability for the country.

It is high time that our political leadership clearly distinguish those power plants which are producing almost negligible electricity but enjoying the payment based upon capacity and those who are producing electricity as par with their capacity payment.

This is high time that our analysts, anchorpersons and civil society should change gear and be thankful to IPPs. We should admit our own mistakes and hold all those accountable who took imprudent decisions. Instead of advocating breaching agreements and pursuing legal action against IPPs, they should urge the government to engage with them respectfully, acknowledging their role in alleviating energy crises.

Moreover, the government should take decisive action to mitigate circular debt in the energy sector. Pakistan should introduce a performance-based payment system, prioritizing performance based payment systems. Besides, revising tariff structures to reflect the true cost of electricity, investing in energy efficiency through grid modernization, and enhancing governance to prevent corruption and mismanagement are crucial steps. These measures would reduce financial leakages and ensure a more sustainable and efficient energy sector.

Qamar Bashir

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.