BR100 Increased By (1.49%)
BR30 Increased By (1.47%)
KSE100 Increased By (1.29%)
KSE30 Increased By (1.36%)
AGHA 7.88 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.68%)
BECO 5.23 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.77%)
BML 58.74 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.14%)
BOP 34.66 Increased By ▲ 0.97 (2.88%)
CNERGY 10.90 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (2.73%)
CSIL 5.43 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (2.45%)
FCCL 54.67 Increased By ▲ 0.93 (1.73%)
FFL 16.79 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (2%)
FNEL 1.23 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.82%)
KEL 7.45 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (2.34%)
KOSM 5.68 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.71%)
LOTCHEM 30.05 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (1.35%)
MLCF 97.44 Increased By ▲ 1.08 (1.12%)
NBP 206.70 Increased By ▲ 3.17 (1.56%)
NCPL 58.36 Increased By ▲ 1.51 (2.66%)
NPL 69.25 Increased By ▲ 1.94 (2.88%)
OGDC 321.90 Increased By ▲ 3.68 (1.16%)
PACE 10.79 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (1.51%)
PAEL 42.77 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (2.39%)
PIBTL 17.20 Increased By ▲ 0.39 (2.32%)
PPL 223.70 Increased By ▲ 3.53 (1.6%)
PRL 52.35 Increased By ▲ 3.30 (6.73%)
PTC 71.10 Increased By ▲ 1.09 (1.56%)
SSGC 29.64 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (1.72%)
TBL 9.87 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.02%)
TELE 8.97 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.7%)
TPL 17.48 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (1.81%)
TPLP 13.04 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (4.24%)
TREET 22.94 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (1.55%)
TRG 60.62 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (0.66%)

LAHORE: Misunderstanding on the part of appropriate officer leads to loss of revenue to the customs department, said sources.

According to sources, after failing to complete final determination within due period, the said lady officer declared the provisional assessment as final one and passed an order to encash the security instrument, which was contested by the importer and secured the security at the end of the day.

According to details, one importer imported a unit of vehicle from UK and filed Goods Declaration for clearance. The assessing officer, as per practice in vogue, approached to the market player for fair assessable value, which provided two different values. The concerned officer preferred to search the value the online portal and assessed value provisionally while the differential amount of duties/taxes was secured through bank guarantee.

However, the assessing officer could not complete the final determination within a period of six months as provided by the law and directed the encashment of bank guarantee.

The appellate forum maintained that the appropriate officer is not in consonance with the purpose, mandate and language of the relevant provisions and got misled by the explanation. It said that the explanation that the provisional assessment means the amount of duties and taxes paid or secured against bank guarantee was misconstrued, as it does not include the additional amount determined on the basis of provisional assessment and the said differential amount is indeed a speculated amount of duty which could ultimately be the actual amount after a complete probe and inquiry for the final determination subject to the stipulated period.

Therefore, the differential amount secured through bank guarantee is not part of the provisional determination and when the appropriate officer failed to pass an order of final determination as per inquiry envisaged under the enabling provision, then the amount only determined as provisional assessment would be deemed as final determination and the differential amount, if already paid, be refunded and returned to the importer if secured through an instrument, i.e., pay order/bank guarantee.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.